Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

It’s evil for reporters to discuss old “charges” without mentioning whether or not there was ever any indictment, trial or conviction. This stuff is in the public record. Why not disclose it? Anybody can “charge” anyone with anything. The press loves moral ambiguity.


51 posted on 05/30/2012 2:04:45 AM PDT by Theophilus (Not merely prolife, but prolific)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Theophilus
It’s evil for reporters to discuss old “charges” without mentioning whether or not there was ever any indictment, trial or conviction. This stuff is in the public record. Why not disclose it? Anybody can “charge” anyone with anything. The press loves moral ambiguity.

The US press starts with a conclusion, and tries to find evidence to support it. Like with the hulking White bully, George Zimmerman.

61 posted on 05/30/2012 2:58:43 AM PDT by Hacksaw (If I had a son, he'd look like George Zimmerman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: Theophilus

he was only charged because he was contempt of court for not showing up to his trial and a warrant was out for arrest money talks and he had been dragging out the case for almost two years. Also he did this to her after she had just got out of the hospital and her kids were home and when he left her for dead cause he left the kids there to take care of themselves


85 posted on 05/31/2012 3:35:13 PM PDT by memenot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson