.
In any other year, that’s a decent argument but this year we have to choose to defeat Obama in any way possible. Even 1/4th of a conservative is better than zero.
Try all you want to convince me otherwise but you’re just doing Obama’s bidding by doing it.
I reject that premise. Obama is a scarecrow. See how he'd do opposed to a Congress with a lot more conservatives -- and it's fair to think there could be a big swing to the right in state and local races. See how he'd do if he was publicly rejected by the majority of voters and won on an anti-mandate plurality. Most Americans loathe him, though the the MSM has the majority of Americans believing they're the minority.
On the other hand, see how Romney (have you really looked at his record?) would do "swept" into office with a "landslide mandate."
Romney has been a liberal statist all of his political life. He has a machine that will spin his "landslide victory" into "mandate" -- including "sensible" and "responsible" legislation to save the planet, "Let's bring the Republican party in to the 21st century, none of this climate change 'denial' stuff" kind of Republican. You know, a grown-up. An adult, as Romney types like to think of themselves. Which tells you how they think of their opposition -- conservatives, people like you and me and the folks we voted for.
Under Romney with a "mandate," moderate Republicans and Democrats would unite in noble bipartisan support of a Republican's solution to the [non-existent] problem -- and conservatives who try to oppose it will be snubbed and told, "Sit down and shut up."