Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama Warns Romney Not To Attack Him On Foreign Policy,...
Weasel Zippers ^ | June19, 2012 | ZIP

Posted on 06/20/2012 6:21:47 AM PDT by SumProVita

Full Title: Obama Warns Romney Not To Attack Him On Foreign Policy, “We Have One President At A Time”…

...because Obama never attacked George W. Bush on his foreign policy when he was president.

(Excerpt) Read more at weaselzippers.us ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; bhofascism; election; elections; fubo; obama; romney; soros
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
Mr. Obama is increasingly being seen by the majority as an utter FAILURE in the areas of foreign policy and economics.

Is he *beginning* to realize that his naivete and tired, old Marxist ideology simply do not achieve anything positive?

1 posted on 06/20/2012 6:22:00 AM PDT by SumProVita
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

It should take about 1.5 seconds to find an example of 0bama “attacking” Bush’s foreign policy while 0bama was a candidate.


2 posted on 06/20/2012 6:23:37 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

But it is okay when obamma did it last election?


3 posted on 06/20/2012 6:25:11 AM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

Nah, it took about 2.5 seconds:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/23/world/americas/23iht-obama.5.5408168.html

Barack Obama criticizes Bush as he outlines foreign policy goals

Published: Monday, April 23, 2007

CHICAGO — Senator Barack Obama said Monday that even though the global image of the United States had been sullied by the war in Iraq and a “foreign policy based on a flawed ideology,” America must repair its standing in the world and resist the temptation to turn inward.

“America cannot meet the threats of this century alone, but the world cannot meet them without America,” Obama said. “We must neither retreat from the world nor try to bully it into submission - we must lead the world, by deed and example.”

In a speech before the Chicago Council on Global Affairs, Obama presented himself as a presidential candidate “who can speak directly to the world.” After a sharp critique of President George W. Bush, Obama called for increasing foreign aid to developing countries, expanding and modernizing the military and rebuilding fractured alliances.

“This president may occupy the White House, but for the last six years the position of leader of the free the world has remained open,” Obama said. “And it’s time to fill that role once more.”


4 posted on 06/20/2012 6:25:11 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Sorry zero but your whole record is open for criticism.


5 posted on 06/20/2012 6:26:00 AM PDT by Ratman83
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
Signal to Romney where prioritize his message and advertising.
6 posted on 06/20/2012 6:26:25 AM PDT by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita
Romney can score huge points by agreeing with Urkel.

He should come out and say something like, "Out of respect for the office of the Presidency, I will not meddle in foreign policy during the campaign like certain candidates did during the 2004 and 2008 campaigns."

7 posted on 06/20/2012 6:27:09 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Aww.. little Miss Thin-Skin is trying to shield herself from criticism? Tell it to the chaplain... it sounds like a personal problem.


8 posted on 06/20/2012 6:28:58 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

Somebody ping Mitt Romney with the link to this story. Then, if the issue comes up (as the media is surely scheming to do), Romney can counter with it.


9 posted on 06/20/2012 6:30:03 AM PDT by Texas Eagle (If it wasn't for double-standards, Liberals would have no standards at all -- Texas Eagle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

As H! said: Partisan criticism is Patriotic.


10 posted on 06/20/2012 6:30:22 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

How about the “invade Pakistan” line he used during one of the debates with McLame?


11 posted on 06/20/2012 6:30:34 AM PDT by SCalGal (Friends don't let friends donate to H$U$ or PETA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB

anyone got a picture of smirky after the 2008 election, trying to take over the country before Bush left office, from his “Office of the President-Elect” podium?


12 posted on 06/20/2012 6:30:34 AM PDT by silverleaf (Every human spent about half an hour as a single cell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Dictators never like to be criticized. Obviously, this university professor never read what Lincoln’s critics called him. Obama is too thin-skinned to hold this office.


13 posted on 06/20/2012 6:31:05 AM PDT by txrefugee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

There was once a time in which the parties agreed that, when it comes to foreign policy issues — while a President is meeting with foreign leaders or non-U.S. soil — they’d refrain from politically based criticism.

Well.. then came the mid-2000s... and the dems tossed that agreement away when they unloaded on Bush at every given opportunity... even when he paid that surprise visit to the troops on Thanksgiving in ‘03 in Iraq. Where the opportunities existed, they pounced.

So, now the shoe is on the other foot, and now King Baraqq wants a free pass?


14 posted on 06/20/2012 6:33:27 AM PDT by ScottinVA (Buying Drain-O requires photo I.D... yet voting doesn't???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

How can anyone attack Obama on foreign policy? - he has none.


15 posted on 06/20/2012 6:33:38 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: silverleaf

Yep, forgot about “office of the President-elect”...

One president at a time, eh?

I guess, in that case, Bush should have just deferred to him and left office early.


16 posted on 06/20/2012 6:34:34 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ratman83
Democrat Barack Obama accused President George W. Bush on Friday of “fear-mongering” for suggesting Democrats wanted to appease terrorists and vowed to meet leaders of hostile nations like Iran if elected.

obama attacks bush foreign policy

Philadelphia Inquirer - Aug 27, 2008
Aug 28, 2008 Washington (PTI): Throwing his weight behind Barack Obama, US Democratic vice presidential candidate Joseph Biden slammed the foreign policies of Bush ... Mr Obama compared Mrs Clinton's position on Iran to President George W Bush's " foreign policy of bluster and sabre-rattling and tough talk". In 2008, Democrats are eager to attack Bush foreign policy. ... Can the earthy Biden help Obama convince voters that the Democrats are best placed to handle ...

17 posted on 06/20/2012 6:35:32 AM PDT by stocksthatgoup (Common sense although common knowledge is seldom common practice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Knife, gun, etc.


18 posted on 06/20/2012 6:35:40 AM PDT by sasquatch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScottinVA

More like tell it to the imam.


19 posted on 06/20/2012 6:36:45 AM PDT by anoldafvet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

I guess “surrender” could be considered a policy.

Is it any wonder that the United States isn’t even referenced in end times prophecy?


20 posted on 06/20/2012 6:37:34 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a Humanist and a Satanist - the latter knows whom he's working for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson