Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Yashcheritsiy; betty boop; Alamo-Girl
However, you might be happy to learn that John Roberts has managed to make the argument you signally failed to, so I'm at least not actively opposing Romney anymore, ... the odds are better with him than with Obama. "

I have made the point repeatedly about the importance of not giving Obama the opportunity to appoint any more Supreme Court court justices in postings made to you and others in just the past ~3 months. You should pay closer attention.

The house in on fire. We have exactly one feasible opportunity within the system left to us to put it out (without bloodshed or violence, as some on this board threaten mindlessly): Election day - Novmber 6, 2012.

Take away our election day, and then we can talk about going to the mat "in blood." There's a time and a place for everything. We're not "there" yet.

You and I understand a thing or two about pharmaceutical science. This illustration might make some sense.

Those still actively opposing Romney refuse to put out the fire unless they are given distilled, deionized ("DI") Water for Injection - USP ("WFI, US Pharmacopoeia") with which to do it. To use anything less is a moral shame of the lowest order and a sin against the Most High God Himself -- so they say.

Barring unforeseen circumstances, he is the given choice this time around. By Him.

Romney may not be "Di-WFI-USP," but for all of anyone else's claims to the contrary, no one else in this race ever was either. At least Romney's, shall we say, "potable."

The day he isn't "potable" is the day we look for another "vendor" to replace him -- as we should do with any non-performing vendor -- whether labled as "Di-WFI-USP" or not.

But for now -- whether we like him or not, he's the near-term answer to dousing the conflagration this Nation has become.

Let's give him a little more slack in the fire hose so we can aim it with more flexibility and less rigidity so as to have a fighting chance to put the fire out this November.

I am happy to know that you have at least chosen to stop aiming your hose at Romney.

The fire is still raging. Let's agree to aim our hose at the base of Obama's fire.

It's how you fight "fires."

FReegards!


37 posted on 06/30/2012 7:36:29 PM PDT by Agamemnon (Darwinism is the glue that holds liberalism together)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Agamemnon

Thank you for sharing your insights, dear Agamemnon!


38 posted on 06/30/2012 9:01:14 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: Agamemnon; betty boop; Alamo-Girl
You should pay closer attention.

I heard what you said - it's just that your presentation and your arguments are not convincing. In other words, my point is not that I don't see the tactical logic in supporting Romney, if only to beat Obama, because this is the mostest importantest election evah. It's that your particular attempts at making your case are so poor and rubbishy that you end up undercutting yourself.

Regardless, I think our discussion has gone on long enough on this particular thread, or perhaps you've simply ceased to be amusing, so I'm through with it for the time being.

39 posted on 06/30/2012 9:03:21 PM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (not voting for the lesser of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson