Team Romney: No, we’re not declaring ‘cease-fire’ on Obamacare

Washington Examiner ^

[Perdogg]

In the days since the Supreme Court decision upholding Obamacare, some Democrats and commentators in the press have suggested that Mitt Romney is declaring a “cease-fire” on the issue and will no longer make it a centerpiece of his campaign to defeat President Obama.

[1010RD]

...explain to me how a conservative can vote for Romney without abandoning his conservative beliefs...

Four More Years of Obama

[rogue yam]

Why can’t you answer one simple and basic question?

I already answered you, but you ignore my answer and ask again and again.

Your behavior demonstrates precisely that my estimation of you is correct.

[Norm Lenhart]

A liar and a coward.

[Diogenesis]

"Peeking Out From the McCain Wreckage: Mitt Romney"

"Someone's got to say it: IS MITT ROMNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR OBAMA'S VICTORY?"

"Vanity: Team Romney Sabotaged Palin and Continuing to Do So?"

"Romney Supporters Trashing Palin"

"Romney advisors sniping at Palin?"

---

---

"We don't intend to turn the Republican Party
 over to the traitors in the battle just ended.
We will have no more of those candidates who are pledged
 to the same goals as our opposition and who seek our support.
Turning the Party over to the so-called moderates
wouldn't make any sense at all.""
--  President Ronald Reagan

[rogue yam]

He has said essentially that, loud and clear.

The people quibbling over his choice of words mainly want him to lose.

[Norm Lenhart]

Doesn’t address or answer the question.

[lodi90]

We don’t have a liberal in the WH now. We have a marxist kenyan in the WH. A marxist with the sword of obamacare all ready to drop on 1/5 of the economy. This country will never be the same if he wins.

Do you want to support the marxist? He has been very clear what he will do to the country in the next 4 years. Is that what you want? Or do you think another 4 years of obama will give conservatives more power in the GOP?

.

[Diogenesis]

RomneyBOTs, like Romney, are cowards.

The FACTS are not on their side, and they
have been exposed LYING, so they insult and hide.

Their one GOAL is to help Obama and Soros.
Not once will they even admit that Romney
partnered with Soros publicly in at least one company.

[Norm Lenhart]

Answer my question directly and I will be happy to directly answer yours.

All you ABO types have refused to answer this for a couple months now and try ducking it by asking a bunch of questions of your own. I’m not going to play that game.

So answer it if you honestly can.

[Leep]

I’ve never watched an entire show of the oxmoronic reality tv show Survivor Island.
However, one thing I know, from what I have seen,that is similar to real life is.. the smart folks get voted off the island early.
Either, Obama and Romney wil be the “survivor” after their manly trial by fire. hahaha.

Yipes.

[Norm Lenhart]

I’d love to see any of them spew their ‘logic’ to a man like Reagan or any of the founding fathers. It’s laughable.

Actually it’s not. It’s going to be the death of what remains of the country. But I guess integrity doesn’t matter when situational ethics are your gospel.

[Eva]

ABO - Anyone But Obama, that’s what this election is about. At this point, that is all it is about. We need to present a united front to defeat Obama at the polls. It doesn’t really matter any longer, just how much better Romney is than Obama. ANYONE is better than Obama.

[dragnet2]

We don’t have a liberal in the WH now. We have a marxist

The other side gets hard core leftist marxist, but the GOP tells us we must support a Republican liberal?

If they other side can get hard core marxist elected, why do we have to settle for a leftist liberal?

There is something terribly wrong with this picture.

Even those drooling in cups are able to see, this is a corrupt con-job.

[Norm Lenhart]

Bill Ayres? Al Sharpton? Eric Holder? Trayvon Martin? Sheila Jackson Lee? Maxine Waters? Sheppard Smith? Ed Schultz?

Anyone?

[Dysart]

But I have also said that the FR He-Man Mitt Haters Club members are irrational and dishonest and committed to preventing Romney from winning the election in November.

Apparently the goal is to squeeze out more and more juice of sour grapes with every negative and defeatist comment, and to roll about in it and call it Conservative elixir. I don't see any percentage in it myself. And it's impossible to distinguish the anti-Romney crowd from the Obama reelection foot soldiers. Strange.

[Norm Lenhart]

Then you should have no difficulty in answering my very simple question!

Please do.

[dragnet2]

And it's impossible to distinguish the anti-Romney crowd from the Obama reelection foot soldiers.

We must vote for the liberal socialist to get rid of the leftist socialist.

A new GOP campaign slogan!

[Eva]

I don’t think that any of the people that you mentioned are running on the Republican ticket against Obama, are they?

[Norm Lenhart]

But that’s not ABO is it? You said ABO. You didn’t say Mitt. You said ABO.

The people I mentioned are no ‘O’. So are they acceptable alternatives to ‘O’ or are you not really ABO and just pro ‘R’?

[aheckle]

If that is the case than why is Obama begging peopel for money so franticly?