Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

WSJ continues to hit Roberts hard.
1 posted on 07/03/2012 2:22:30 PM PDT by nerdgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: nerdgirl

Someone could make a fortune out of selling “Roberts” toilet paper, dartboards, and urinal cakes. Maybe Roberts needs to call Jane Fonda for some advice on how to handle being a traitor.


2 posted on 07/03/2012 2:33:02 PM PDT by HerrBlucher ( Romney blows with the political winds, Obama just blows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

3 posted on 07/03/2012 2:33:16 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

How will Roberts rule if Obama decides he wants to be President for life...or at least a third term?


4 posted on 07/03/2012 2:33:38 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

Roberts is simple to figure out, and weak-minded. He caved to media pressure, headed up by the Obama regime. He will do more of it in the future, because he is a media darling and pop star now. Think of him as the McCain of the Supreme Court. He is a painted turd, and no matter how pretty he looks to some people, he is still a turd stinking up the room.


5 posted on 07/03/2012 2:39:40 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

Barack Obama is so smart.

Michelle Obama is so smart.

Valarie Jarrett is so smart.

Hillary Clinton is so smart.

And now John Roberts is so smart too.

And we are all just too stoo-pid to understand how smart they are.

We are all just too stoo-pid to see how stoo-pid we are.

Please, won’t someone help us?

/sarcasm


7 posted on 07/03/2012 2:42:42 PM PDT by Iron Munro (John Adams: 'Two ways to enslave a country. One is by the sword, the other is by debt')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

From now on, let’s refer to this case as ‘Roberts vs. The Constitution.’

He wants a legacy? Let’s give him one.


10 posted on 07/03/2012 2:46:03 PM PDT by sourcery (If true=false, then there would be no constraints on what is possible. Hence, the world exists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl
"THESE are the times that try men's souls. The summer soldier and the sunshine patriot will, in this crisis, shrink from the service of their country; but he that stands by it now, deserves the love and thanks of man and woman. Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph. What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly: it is dearness only that gives every thing its value. Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as FREEDOM should not be highly rated. Britain, with an army to enforce her tyranny, has declared that she has a right (not only to TAX) but "to BIND us in ALL CASES WHATSOEVER" and if being bound in that manner, is not slavery, then is there not such a thing as slavery upon earth. Even the expression is impious; for so unlimited a power can belong only to God."

-The American Crisis, December 23, 1776, Thomas Paine

-PJ

12 posted on 07/03/2012 2:56:20 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (If you can vote for President, then your children can run for President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl
Its extremely suspicious that the 'accepted rationale' for Roberts goofy opinion was avoidance of exactly what the white house and democrats were warning would happen if he went the other way. How convenient.

Even FR's polyannas have to agree we were had.

14 posted on 07/03/2012 2:57:55 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

“...when the court will likely confront a host of hot-button issues, including affirmative action, gay marriage and the continued vitality of the Voting Rights Act.”

Or, maybe not if Romneybama isn’t a afraid to rule by executive order.

Two can play at that game.


15 posted on 07/03/2012 2:58:03 PM PDT by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

Neither fish nor fowl, Roberts will be forever distrusted by both sides, but I suppose that’s part of his “gen(i)us.”


18 posted on 07/03/2012 3:24:03 PM PDT by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

I don’t know why he needs political capital when he’s appointed for life.


19 posted on 07/03/2012 3:28:39 PM PDT by proud American in Canada (Pray for America. She is the world's last best hope for freedom. May it not be too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

the stupid GOP should start running this AD. “If you are uninsured and ahve a job, you now must get insurance - (insert Pelosi about free riders and Obambi making a comment) then tell them this will cost you about $200.00 per month because they think you need the smae coverage as your parents. Tell the president you think this is great and you can’t wait to pay.”


20 posted on 07/03/2012 3:33:45 PM PDT by q_an_a (the more laws the less justice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

Why is every “CONSERVATIVE”?? news pundits making excuses for this Chief Justice? This justice showed his complete abhorant to the constitution, by giving these liberals an out. Who cares whether OBAMA CARE is a penalty or a tax? IT’S UNCONSTITUTIONAL. Every one with more brains than a goat, realises this. But because this justice gave these Washington liberals the excuse why they passed this abhorant law, they can all go back to smoking their hemp, and be very satisfied that they have at least another Warren Court they can be satisfied with. While we the people keep trying to appoint CONSTRUCTIONIST justices, these justices keep stabbing us in the back.


21 posted on 07/03/2012 3:38:24 PM PDT by gingerbread
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

So how much did Roberts get in payback for this disaster?


23 posted on 07/03/2012 3:51:59 PM PDT by bgill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

Well, this gives Roberts precedence to rule in favor of the government when they tell everyone that unless they buy a GM car they’ll face a government penalty.


25 posted on 07/03/2012 4:03:12 PM PDT by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: nerdgirl

As well they should. Roberts is a coward and a traitor.


30 posted on 07/03/2012 6:11:29 PM PDT by Nifster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregH; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

34 posted on 07/05/2012 9:10:55 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lurking Libertarian; JDW11235; Clairity; TheOldLady; Spacetrucker; Art in Idaho; GregH; ...

FReepmail me to subscribe to or unsubscribe from the SCOTUS ping list.

35 posted on 07/05/2012 9:11:21 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan (Man is not free unless government is limited. ~Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson