Obama's Social Security Number challenged

WND ^ | July 5, 2012 | Jack Cashill

[Smokeyblue]

If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 25 years than from his birth certificate.

Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.

Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”

To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.

Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.

As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”

When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.

[Vermont Lt]

Your Social Security card says right on it that it cannot be used for identification.

While I appreciate the absurdity in that statement, I would argue that is what any judge will use to toss this out on its reader end.

[Vermont Lt]

Your Social Security card says right on it that it cannot be used for identification.

While I appreciate the absurdity in that statement, I would argue that is what any judge will use to toss this out on its rear end.

[cynwoody]

Guano.

Jean Paul Ludwig’s SSN was 045-26-8722. Nothing like Zero’s, which is 042-68-4425.

http://www.familyrelatives.com/search/us_search/detail_usassdi.php?id=45268722&fn=Jean&ln=Ludwig&page=S&page=S

[ebysan]

“Check out the SS website link and check for yourself.”

*******************************************************************

Obama Administration put in a change to the way SS numbers are now distributed..... They will be “randomly” administered....as of June 25, 2011

***************************************************************************
“NOT” by State & County as they had been for 40 + years.......Why?? This is another cover-up!!

Number Has Three Parts

The nine-digit SSN is composed of three parts:

The first set of three digits is called the Area Number
The second set of two digits is called the Group Number
The final set of four digits is the Serial Number

http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/ssnvhighgroup.htm

Attention All Users

This will be the FINAL publication of the High Group List.

The implementation of SSN Randomization on June 25, 2011 eliminates the significance of the High Group List, making it ineffective for validating SSNs issued through the new random assignment method. Please visit SSN Randomization for more information regarding this change and other effects on the SSN resulting from Randomization.

[SvenMagnussen]

“A red herring...the SSN Obama is currently using was originally issued to a person who was born in 1890. SSN’s cannot be re-issued.”

Not true. Susan Daniels is using a database of gathered personal data and not the SS Index. Born 1890 is factually inaccurate.

[cynwoody]

Because using a fraudulent SS# is fraud and that number belonged to someone else.

To whom else did it belong?

[justiceseeker93]

In 1977, Barack Hussein Obama II was a Permanent Resident Alien (Green card holder) living in Hawaii with his grandmother, Madelyn Dunham. Madelyn Dunham had been appointed Obama’s guardian (foster mother) while he was in the legal custody of Catholic Social Services of Connecticut.

A children’s services case manager working for Catholic Social Services of Connecticut filed on behalf Obama for his SSN in 1977.

It would seem rather unusual that an adolescent living in Hawaii would be under the legal custody of Catholic Social services of Connecticut. Why Connecticut, of all places? What's the connection between the grandmother and the state of Connecticut?

I'm not deliberately playing "devil's advocate" here, but without documentation, this is nothing but speculation on your part, Brown Deer.

[cynwoody]

Read the next sentence. It says that a fraudulent SSN is a violation of both the Federal and State Constitutions, which would preclude FUBO from running again.

Where does the Constitution mention SSNs? LOL!

He can be a total fraud and still run and be elected perfectly legally. We saw it happen in 2008. If we waste our time chasing down rabbit holes, it just might happen again next November.

[Brown Deer]

...but without documentation, this is nothing but speculation on your part, Brown Deer.

My part? How so?

[Brown Deer]

We all know that you don't really care, but buying and selling counterfeit or legitimate Social Security cards is a crime.

If you suspect someone has committed these crimes, contact the OIG Fraud Hotline.

[justiceseeker93]

My part? How so?

You are stating a set of facts which, if true, would render the controversial Social Security number used by Obama to be a legitimate number.

So it would be perfectly reasonable for you to explain how you gained knowledge of those alleged facts and to prove that they are true.

If you are incapable of proving those facts true, than we would have to consider them as speculation or theorizing.

[Brown Deer]

You are stating a set of facts...

Me?

So it would be perfectly reasonable for you to explain how you gained knowledge of those alleged facts and to prove that they are true.

Okay: To 80



Please let us know if you want off the list.

[Labyrinthos]

You’re just angry because the birthers StILL have an issue.

I'm always angry when someone misrepresents the Constitution, whether that person is Obama, Roberts, World Nut Daily, or a Birther.

[Labyrinthos]

You’re just angry because the birthers StILL have an issue.

I'm always angry when someone misrepresents the Constitution, whether that person is Obama, Roberts, World Nut Daily, or a Birther.

[BluH2o]

If you are incapable of proving those facts true, than we would have to consider them as speculation or theorizing.

That's exactly what Brown Deer is doing, stating this bogus theory as fact with no credible supporting data. None, zip, nada.

[Brown Deer]

So it would be perfectly reasonable for you...
...and to prove that they are true.

No, that's not reasonable.

[Brown Deer]

That's exactly what Brown Deer is doing, stating this bogus theory as fact with no credible supporting data.

[x]

..I give up. Why is this important? I don’t see how the SS# itself is relevant to the ballot....

Can you make a few guesses why it might be relevant?

Beats me.

[Sherman Logan]

I guess I should have been more clear. I wasn’t talking about judges at all, but rather state legislatures.

[Labyrinthos]

I think some look at this as just another nail in the coffin of Obama’s ineligibility because if he was born here then he would not have to steal a SS number he could have just applied for one like the rest of us did. Right or wrong it does make you wonder why.

Any lawful resident of the United States -- no matter where he or she is born -- can apply for and obtain a Social Security number. Thus, even a person born in Kenya would not have to steal a SSN.