Posted on 07/05/2012 9:53:40 AM PDT by Smokeyblue
If Barack Obama has an immediate eligibility problem, it is more likely to derive from the Social Security Number he has been using for the last 25 years than from his birth certificate.
Ohio private investigator Susan Daniels has seen to that. On Monday, July 2, she filed suit in Geauga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Court demanding that Jon Husted, Ohio secretary of state, remove Obama’s name from the ballot until Obama can prove the validity of his Social Security Number.
Daniels, who has vetted thousands of Social Security Numbers for numerous other clients, has done her homework. In her filing, she thoroughly documents her contention “that Barack Obama has repeatedly, consistently, and with intent misrepresented himself by using a fraudulently obtained Social Security Number.”
To acquire appropriate standing in court, Daniels has gone to the trouble of establishing herself as a valid write-in candidate for president. Before she is through, this 70-something mother of seven, who has been a licensed Ohio PI since 1995, may cause Obama more trouble than the Romney campaign.
Daniels started her investigation in August 2009. Given her profession, she has been able to access a variety of proprietary databases. What she learned without much trouble is that Obama has been using a Social Security Number with the prefix “042″ since 1986.
As she discovered, the “042″ number is reserved for the exclusive use of individuals who register in Connecticut. When she ran 10 sequential numbers before and after Obama’s, all returned with the documentation “issued 1977-1979 in CT.”
When Daniels ran the numbers immediately flanking Obama’s, she came to the firm conviction that Obama’s number was issued in March 1977 in Connecticut.
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
I guess I should have been more clear. I wasn’t talking about judges at all, but rather state legislatures.
I guess I should have been more clear. I wasn’t talking about judges at all, but rather state legislatures.
You’re right. A governor could do that. It would promptly be overturned by a court on the accurate basis that a state governor is given no power by the Constitution to interfere in presidential elections.
You seem to suffer from a common delusion about an executive order. An EO is valid if it directs implementation of a power already held by a president or governor. If it goes beyond these bounds, it has no legal validity.
You claimed that a sovereign state is not bound to abide by federal law if it disagrees. I quoted the Constitution itself to the contrary. You wish to address this discrepancy?
… there was more than one SS# associated with Obama
How long have you been this stupid?
I always wonder that at some of his replies
Then why not show everybody here where the Constitution says that foreigner is eligible to be President of the United States.
David Axelrod: How many of these revelations will it take for the media to demand a full accounting of Mitt’s tax returns and finances?
You know, logic, facts and such.
And by not bothering to read the thread before posting.
btw dumbo, how did you get in the marines without knowing how to read?
I never claimed that a foreigner is eligibe under the Constitution to run for POTUS. NEVER SAID IT! You're just like a liberal: When you can't win the debate and get backed into a corner, you change the issue to something that is not in dispute and then claim victory. I can't argue with stupidity.
No, I didn't dumbass. (brown deer)
btw dumbo, how did you get in the marines without knowing how to read? (brown deer)
Brown Deer you qualify as the ultimate skank, which is way lower than whale s***.
It doesn't, and not just because Socialist Security wasn't around when the Constitution was written. It doesn't say anything about whether a person has to have a clean police record to be eligible to serve as president.
In this case, since he's already serving, the correct remedy is impeachment, conviction, and removal from office.
O my god. Listen to you. Loosen your little lord Fauntleroy bow tie for a minute and follow your logic Torie. The Rubicon was crossed (apparently) by the federal behemoth long ago and this latest stunt was probably one of the final straws - hell, I don’t know - but you are stuck between, on one side, posting on this site, and on another side sounding like one of the screws that would be lining up with the fucking lawyers and flatfoot state prosecutors for their side.
You’re still quoting the constitution? Haven’t you heard? When the supreme court decides it can levy taxes, it becomes incoherent and irrelevant. It’s an arm of the executive branch. Political operatives.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.