I never claimed that a foreigner is eligibe under the Constitution to run for POTUS. NEVER SAID IT! You're just like a liberal: When you can't win the debate and get backed into a corner, you change the issue to something that is not in dispute and then claim victory. I can't argue with stupidity.
NO, I did not change the issue. The implication of the stolen SS# is that the man may not have been eligible to legally get a SS# because he may not have been born in the country. Since he has not provided proof of his eligibility as per the US Constitution, the question remains.
These people going after Obama are the same ones that have been going after him about his unreleased long form.
This is ALL part of the same issue by the same people.
Yes, stealing someone's social security number is a fraud. You claim that's not in the Constitution. Well, these people are not ultimately looking to go after Obama for fraud (though that may be something Obama may have to face). They're looking to go after him about his eligibility as per the US Constitution and they are using the stolen SS#s in order to question that eligibility with hopes that the court will order Obama's sealed records to be opened so the eligibility issue will be cleared.
Get with the program. Research before you start making comments on an issue.