Posted on 07/05/2012 11:02:18 AM PDT by Kaslin
As NewsBusters reported Saturday, Politico has officially cut ties with White House correspondent Joe Williams for saying presumptive Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney is more comfortable around "white folks."
Throwing caution to the wind, Salon editor at large Joan Walsh on Thursday doubled-down on these caustic comments writing, "It’s almost certainly a fact that Mitt Romney is more comfortable around white people":
But it is just a fact that Republicans today are disproportionately white and older than the rest of the country. It’s almost certainly a fact that Mitt Romney is more comfortable around white people (unless he leads a secret multi-culti life that we don’t know about). Look at his crowds. Look at his friends. Look at his advisors. Look at that video where he sings “Who Let The Dogs Out?” with black people on Martin Luther King Jr. Day in Jacksonville, Fla.
What precipitated these comments from Walsh was her desire to defend herself from a NewsBusters article reporting racist remarks she made on Monday subsequently linked by the Drudge Report Wednesday:
I spent part of my Fourth of July with Matt Drudge fans, after Drudge linked to a silly Newsbusters piece taking umbrage at my interview with PBS’s Tavis Smiley on Monday. (Here’s the whole thing.) Umbrage-addicted Noel Sheppard found fault with most of what I said, but he and his readers were most outraged when I told Smiley that Republicans have “an older white base that doesn’t quite understand how healthcare works.” Also big on Drudge Wednesday: Chris Rock Tweeting “Happy white peoples independence day, the slaves weren’t free but I’m sure they enjoyed fireworks.
Umbrage-addicted?
Talk about the pot and the kettle, Walsh at this point in her career spends most of her time on MSNBC taking umbrage with every conservative on the planet.
If there were a methadone treatment for umbrage-addiction, Walsh's recommended dosage would 100 time mine.
But I digress:
In the context of my interview with Smiley, it’s clear I’m taking about healthcare reform, or Obamacare. I could have been clearer about that. Either way, the statement is factually true. On the “older white base” part: Only 64 percent of Americans today are non-Hispanic whites, but 89 percent of voters who identified themselves as Republicans in 2009 Gallup polls were non-Hispanic whites. In 2012, more than 90 percent of GOP primary voters were white, and voters over 50 comprised a majority of the electorate in every single exit poll conducted, according to National Journal. In the 2010 congressional midterms, 63 percent of whites over 50 voted Republican.
In 2010, 60 percent of whites voted for Republican House members. There was no "Vote by Race and Age" category in those exit polls, but 59 percent of those 65 and over voted Republican.
As such, in the previous two elections, there wasn't a huge difference between how whites and older whites voted.
But the reality is that ageism isn't the issue. It's that Walsh accused any segment of one race of not understanding how something works.
She tried to defend herself thusly:
On “they don’t quite understand healthcare [reform]” – well, that almost goes without saying, because to be honest, almost nobody entirely understands it. It is complicated, I’ll concede that. But that’s a dodge I don’t need to use. The Tea Party’s failure to understand the healthcare system, and not merely Obamacare, is immortalized in its members’ many demands to “keep government out of my Medicare” — reported not only by President Obama but by conservative Republican Bob Inglis.
I would agree that "almost nobody entirely understands" healthcare, but that's not what she said. She specifically accused older whites of not understanding it.
As for the Tea Party sign regarding keeping government out of Medicare, that point was specific to the section in ObamaCare that takes money from Medicare to fund it.
Many seniors on both sides of the aisle were displeased by this thereby making this Tea Party claim by Walsh a red herring that so many of her ilk like to resort to.
But here was the real laugher: "We are living in a moment when right-wing extremists are casting any critical observation about white people as racism — and the mainstream media, already tongue-tied about race, has no idea how to respond."
This from a woman who casts any critical observation about Obama as racist. One example among many was when she accused Newt Gingrich of racism for calling Obama "the most successful food stamp president in American history,"
She also agreed in November 2010 that conservative criticism of Obama's trip to India had racist overtones.
The fact is that Walsh smells racism in everything associated with this president, and has been pointing fingers at white people for months if not years:
Actual Joan Walsh Salon Headline: 'What’s The Matter With White People?'
Joan Walsh: 'Newt Is the Face of the Politics' of 'Racism and Angry White Male Rage
Joan Walsh - The Most Bigoted Journalist in Media?
Joan Walsh: Sherrod Can Call Fox and Breitbart Racist Because Father Was Killed By White Man
Salon’s Walsh Jumps the Shark -- Calls GOP Senators Bigots for Invoking Manhattan’s Upper West Side
Hardball: Joan Walsh Calls Republican Critics of Obama 'Un-American' and 'Traitorous'
Matthews, Walsh Unsubtly Accuse Obama Opponents Of Racism
See a trend here?
Walsh sees racism everywhere EXCEPT when she's the guilty party.
In this instance, I very much agree that citing race statistics when covering politics or the economy should not be deemed as racist.
However, when you point fingers at part of an ethnic group for not understanding something, that's a whole different story?
Being white and old doesn't make people stupid, and saying it does is racist no matter how you try to defend it.
It is a metaphysical certitude Walsh and her ilk would be shouting racism from the rooftops if a conservative commentator said there is "an older black base that doesn’t quite understand how healthcare works."
As that most certainly would have started a liberal firestorm, it should be equally offensive when the word "white" is substituted for "black."
Anyone disagreeing with that must be, well, racist.
And Obama is most comfortable around Muslims and the peeps form the Hood. So what’s her point?
‘It’s Almost Certainly a Fact That Romney Is More Comfortable Around White People’
And?
I’m with you - what a yawn...
They have gone beyond “debate and discussion” long ago, and we have continued to treat them as if they were honest brokers in the discussion.
That’s what these accusations of racism are all about, trying to actively exclude and suppress opponents’ viewpoints. And we have, for far too long, acquiesced to the tactic and backed off whenever the topic of race was insinuated.
I think calling them on it would shock them to no end.
They’ve lost the ability to debate, because they’ve gotten away with opposition suppression for far too long.
Put her in a room full of Trayvons and let’s see how comfortable she is.
That's why they started the Congressional Black Caucus to begin with.
Joan Walsh: ‘It’s Almost Certainly a Fact That Romney Is More Comfortable Around White People’
Translation from Democrat Party Media Whore Lingo to English: ‘It’s Almost Certainly a Fact That Obama Is More Comfortable Around Crooked Rich White People’
“morons”?
more like “people who feel they are entitled to use their offices to enrich themselves and their family and friends”.
Re: Joan Walsh, Laz would still hit it, albeit with a 2x4.
Very good! We are in complete agreement.
***Hysteria Alert***
Can someone please explain what that phrase means? My high school journalism teacher would have put a big red X over any article I turned in with that kind of imprecise language. (For that matter, I think my third grade teacher would have done the same thing.)
Another white cracker ho playing the race card. Whadda country!
Re Romney more comfortable with white people:
After living in a number of cities, I am too.
So is Jesse Jackson, as shown by his famous quote that he’s relieved when he hears several young men behind them when he’s alone if he turns around and they’re white.
And Obama is clearly more comfortable with black people.
So what??? This should affect someone’s vote... how?
Sorry MrB.
It’s just that when I think of the CBC, I picture Maxine, Sheila, Cynthia, Frederica, Corrine, Hank (Guam) Johnson and the dude who claimed that sharks changed their feeding habits because of the slave trade. Can’t remember his name right off.
Joan Walsh is clearly more comfortable around wife beaters like Joe Williams.
It’s obvious that BAM is more comfy around black folk.
That’s cause he doesn’t like to socialize with his marks. Truth be told, Obama is most comfortable among white gays.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.