Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iopscusa

In before the first drug warrior claiming conservatism means supporting big government programs to make people act in accordance with their beliefs, no matter how expensive, how much the para-military thugs are a danger to democracy, no matter how much the Constitution is destroyed, and no matter how fruitless it is to attempt to protect idiots from themselves.

Also, in before the tear-filled post about how drugs killed some random love one, despite the illogic in supporting a drug war that clearly failed to protect said idiot loved one against him or herself.

And, in pre-rebuttal, no I don’t smoke pot and never have, and think those who do are idiots. I just don’t want to spend my tax money in a pointless attempt to keep them from doing drugs.


3 posted on 07/18/2012 10:57:06 AM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (I will never vote for Romney. Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: TheThirdRuffian

Society might survive legal marijuana. But legal hard drugs? Look at the societies that tolerated them: America in the 19th century, pre-communist China, Iran until the late 1950s. All had HUGE addict populations - the Iranians still do.

The drug war is a necessary evil. I wish it wasn’t, but it is.


4 posted on 07/18/2012 11:08:07 AM PDT by I Shall Endure
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson