Their position is that Obama was taken out of context. Perhaps the paper would like to hear some more opinions.
Hussein's flicking of the middle finger at entrepreneurs merely revealed his Collectivist mindset.
Not sure why the paper wants to defend that.
posted on 07/20/2012 9:55:01 AM PDT
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
Just shows that anyone can rise up to be president, even a street hustler with someone giving him $1B for a campaign.
posted on 07/20/2012 10:00:30 AM PDT
(I am voting for Sarah after getting screwed again by the DC Thugs.)
posted on 07/20/2012 10:05:24 AM PDT
by Hotlanta Mike
(Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
Now you know why the mediaWHORES held off for four or five days from reporting the historical gaffe! They were punished for rushing too quickly with the TAX line news report from Roberts. They were admonished and reprimanded to keep silent until they could figure out a way to spin and do damage control. Gosh I hate these pukes!!
James Taranto does a great job ripping this defense to shreds:
The Team then explains: "The President's full remarks show that the 'that' in 'you didn't build that' clearly refers to roads and bridges--public infrastructure we count on the government to build and maintain."
That's bunk, and not only because "business" is more proximate to the pronoun "that" and therefore its more likely antecedent. The Truth Team's interpretation is ungrammatical. "Roads and bridges" is plural; "that" is singular. If the Team is right about Obama's meaning, he should have said, "You didn't build those."
Barack Obama is supposed to be the World's Greatest Orator, the smartest man in the world. Yet his campaign asks us to believe he is not even competent to construct a sentence.
posted on 07/20/2012 10:14:23 AM PDT
(Bain Capital would not have bought into Solyndra)
Take a look at what appeared yesterday in the Chicago Tribune. Even the Liberal Rag, The Charlotte Observer, picked it up this morning.
Who else, Mr. President?
posted on 07/20/2012 10:15:59 AM PDT
(Vote Everyone Out!)
posted on 07/20/2012 10:16:26 AM PDT
(Like Barack said, "We can't be broke cause we still have checks in the checkbook.")
Now even an original speech; Lenin said it first.
And we all know how well THAT went.
Actual title of the article:
Obamas Roanoke speech becomes fodder for Romney ad
posted on 07/20/2012 10:30:11 AM PDT
by Cyber Liberty
(Obama considers the Third World morally superior to the United States.)
It was businesses first, then roads and bridges. Why build roads and bridges if there’s no businesses to use them?
posted on 07/20/2012 10:59:41 AM PDT
("Ambition Without Talent Is Sad - Talent Without Ambition Is Worse")
Lets go out on a limb and say that is what Obama was TRYING to say.
Those business owners paid the taxes (both PERSONAL and BUSINESS) to build those roads, so YES THEY DID BUILD THAT!
Their businesses brought employees and consumers to the area to pay TAXES that paid for those, so he is still WRONG and CLUELESS!
posted on 07/20/2012 11:11:38 AM PDT
(PRAYER: It's the only HOPE for real CHANGE in America!)
owebama hates America. The commiecrats can try to spin his words all they want to but it does not change the fact that
OWEBAMA HATES AMERICA!
posted on 07/20/2012 11:13:24 AM PDT
(BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED)
Don’t forget-in the same speech, he mocked successful people for “thinking they’re smarter,” and that they “worked harder,” to which Obama said there are “a lot of smart people” who also “ work hard.” When you put all of that together, it’s clear he meant to cut success down completely, not give credit to government’s “contribution.”
posted on 07/21/2012 4:52:41 PM PDT
by Lou L
(Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson