Readers become so jaded, this (journalistic reporting) is, like everything else, the 'new normal'.
We always give them (media) the leeways, well, because it is the NY Times, or WaPo, or you name it.
Until we the society in general demand more independence, integrity and responsibility from those who call themselves journalists/editorial boards, it is so easy for them to become the mouthpiece of a certain political party, and the outright propaganda machine for one-sided views.
To: Sir Napsalot
When I said ‘one-sided views’, I meant Statists for both Dem and Repub party.
2 posted on
07/26/2012 4:44:00 AM PDT by
Sir Napsalot
(Pravda + Useful Idiots = CCCP; JournOList + Useful Idiots = DopeyChangey!)
To: Sir Napsalot
I kind of understand quote approval agreement for an interview that is granted. It is because the media is now so dishonest they will deliberately twist words and massage the quotes to change the intent of what the interviewed person is saying. Everyone knows it and nobody wants to deal with it. The media allows it because they know it too.
3 posted on
07/26/2012 4:53:52 AM PDT by
BRL
To: Sir Napsalot
that "freedom of the press" thingy died long ago (early '60s)...
esp. since "Cam(e)alot/JFK" and the "We must form the news, not just report it" media mindset.
4 posted on
07/26/2012 4:58:39 AM PDT by
skinkinthegrass
(WA DC E$tabli$hment; DNC/RNC/Unionists...Brazilian saying: "$@me Old $hit; different flie$". :^)
To: Sir Napsalot
So the fifth-column mainstream media are essentially Obamabuttboys and liberal skanks. Surprise, surprise.
To: Sir Napsalot
Actually, I read the report and didn’t react either. Was this news to anyone? Whether we thought it was a formal quote approval agreement or something more vague but just as effective, we all know that the NYT and the rest of the mainstream media no longer provide anything that qualifies as objective news except by accident. Having reconsidered this story, I still don’t care. NYT, WaPo, and the rest are unreliable tools of the government and of crony-capitalist corporations, and the details don’t interest me.
7 posted on
07/26/2012 5:54:44 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
To: Sir Napsalot
CNN became boot-lickers in Iraq and Cuba when they slanted their reports and cut the regimes slack at every turn. Some ‘journalists’.
8 posted on
07/26/2012 6:02:26 AM PDT by
JPG
(Whatever semantics are used, it is still a TAX.)
To: Sir Napsalot
Like my Dad always said, “You can believe only half of what you read in the newspapers, and only half of that is true.”
9 posted on
07/26/2012 6:07:43 AM PDT by
rwa265
("This is My Beloved Son, Listen to Him.")
To: Sir Napsalot
If enough conservatives truly cared, which they don’t, they could run the NYT out of business and buy it at yard sale price.
10 posted on
07/26/2012 6:51:45 AM PDT by
Lady Lucky
(If you believe what you're saying, quit making taxable income.)
To: Sir Napsalot
If you want access, you will play ball the way the king wants.
That and many are happy to follow orders. They are true believers, and will do whatever it takes to win.
11 posted on
07/26/2012 7:05:18 AM PDT by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Sir Napsalot
Here's how young journo thought pattern works:
- They got Nixon, whoever he was
- Subsequent Presidents have made sure to never get got
- Except Clinton, and he got away with it
- So good reporting is a veneer anyway
- I'd rather opinioniate/agitate anyway, it's easier than reporting
- And the paper will print it unquestioningly, even if false
- Oh, what? The paper downsized again? I'm out of a job?
12 posted on
07/26/2012 7:35:22 AM PDT by
StAnDeliver
(2008 + IN, NC, FL, VA, OH, NV o/r IA = 271EV)
To: Sir Napsalot
Journalism of the Drive By Media ( i.e. CBS, NBC, ABC, NYT, WaPo, CNN, etc) has been officially dead ever since Uncle Walter...
threw the United States under the bus in Vietnam in 1968.
14 posted on
07/26/2012 9:39:48 AM PDT by
Bender2
("I've got a twisted sense of humor, and everything amuses me." RAH Beyond this Horizon)
To: Timesink; martin_fierro; reformed_democrat; Loyalist; =Intervention=; PianoMan; GOPJ; ...
Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING
The lack of reaction to a New York Times report filed by Jeremy Peters on July 15 and found on the front page of the its July 16 print edition has, at least to me, been nothing short of stunning. ....
What Peters told readers, in essence, is that White House officials, the Obama administration in general, the Obama for America campaign, the campaign of presidential challenger Mitt Romney (though the evidence Peters provided is thin and seems to relate largely to the candidates family), and powerful Washington politicians on Capitol Hill are dictating what the press will print concerning their nonpublic statements and remarks and that the press is, for the most part, acquiescing with little if any objection.
The same as when Mark Halperin at ABC News (now at Time-Lies) said that both sides would not be held to the same standards.
http://www.drudgereportarchives.com/data/2004/10/09/20041009_195805_mh.htmABCNEWS POLITICAL DIRECTOR MEMO SPARKS CONTROVERSY: BOTH SIDES NOT 'EQUALLY ACCOUNTABLE'
And these are the same presstitute Stalinists who will be moderating the debates.
15 posted on
07/26/2012 10:20:41 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(Eric Holder's NAACP rally against the voter ID laws required the press to bring govt issue photo ID.)
To: Sir Napsalot
Those people who do not read the newspaper are uninformed. Those people who do read the newspaper are miss informed...
21 posted on
07/26/2012 11:56:11 AM PDT by
PushinTin
(Politicians are like diapers, the need to be changed often and for the same reason...)
To: Sir Napsalot
Print is the sharpest and the strongest weapon of our party. -- Joseph Stalin
To: Sir Napsalot
24 posted on
07/26/2012 4:39:35 PM PDT by
combat_boots
(The Lion of Judah cometh. Hallelujah. Gloria Patri, Filio et Spiritui Sancto.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson