“Would your response be to grovel on the floor and thank them for unlawfully entering your private property? Perhaps you would find someplace like Cuba or North Korea more in tune to your liking.”
Why, because they think a lawful shooting based on what might be a clerical error would be applauded by morons? Got that here already, it seems.
Sorry - I don’t think that an unlawful entry in error couldn’t be sorted out by other means than a gun, cowboy, but it could. All this anti-LEO shoot first don’t worry about the consequences sounds like pure BS to me. Does that disappoint you? And no, there wouldn’t be any “groveling” if someone came into my house without reason or unless there was an error. I promise.
>> I don’t think that an unlawful entry in error couldn’t be sorted out by other means than a gun, cowboy, but it could.
If I understand that convoluted sentence of yours correctly, you’re saying that an unlawful entry could be “sorted out” by some means other than shooting the cop.
Very well - explain how. And explain what “sorted out” means.
I offered you the chance to explain this earlier but you sidestepped my question. Will you sidestep it again? Or will you man up?