Skip to comments.
Mitt Romney Comes Out in Support of Homosexual Boy Scout Leaders, Members
Christian News ^
| August 6, 2012
| Heather Clark
Posted on 08/07/2012 6:36:10 AM PDT by xzins
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 421-428 next last
To: Steamburg
Mitt is a lot of things, but honest isn’t one of them, lying is a way of life for him.
161
posted on
08/07/2012 8:50:43 AM PDT
by
ansel12
(Massachusetts Governors,,, where the GOP goes for it's "conservative" Presidential candidates.)
To: greyfox
I doubt that Romney supports Pedophiles in the boy scouts and I do believe there is a difference between a gay person and a pedophile. See post #16:
100% of male pedophiles who prey on young boys are HOMOSEXUAL.
162
posted on
08/07/2012 8:52:46 AM PDT
by
Never on my watch
(I can see November from the Chick-Fil-A drive through lane.)
To: xzins
What does the Mormon church teach on the subject of homosexuality and will they allow homosexual marriage or homosexuals in leadership roles? Does Romney disagree with his church?
163
posted on
08/07/2012 8:53:10 AM PDT
by
kalee
(The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we engrave in marble. J Huett 1658)
To: StAnDeliver
Santorum, like every other registered candidate, signed a pledge to support the party's nominee.
That's the way it is.
Now, to deny Romney the nomination ~ first, get a place to meet. Second, get enough delegates to attend the meeting that Romney can't get the nomination.
Restart the party.
Presumably we can do this lawfully.
To: fishtank
they sure understood what he meant by those lines.
ABOs in denial should read that poster/flyer and think about the words that he has just reaffirmed.
He’s had nearly 20 years to reconsider them, to revise them, to recant them. He’s got a conservative wing in his party that will vote or stay home, and he gets a chance to make a statement about the boy scouts because a court has upheld their right to choose their own rules.
So what does Mitt do?
He confirms those old, gay agenda words.
With that much time to reconsider, one can only see this as doubling down.
Conservatives — even ABOs — should pay close attention.
165
posted on
08/07/2012 8:55:15 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
To: greyfox
Keep it up boys Obama is ribbing his hands thanks to people like you. I guess you really support O Let them keep thing this. (see Art of War) I will ENTHUSIASTICALLY vote for Romney and am encouraging all my friends and relatives to vote. The survival of our Republic is at stake. Romney may not be my idea of a conservative candidate, but when you have the choice between the Anti-Christ and anyone else, you don't vote for the Anti-Christ.
166
posted on
08/07/2012 8:55:19 AM PDT
by
A. Patriot
(Re-electing Obama is like the Titanic backing up to hit the iceberg again.)
To: fwdude
Lets see the Mittbots spin this. The way they always do: with "you're an Obama supporter".
167
posted on
08/07/2012 8:59:08 AM PDT
by
Colonel_Flagg
(Conservatism is not a matter of convenience.)
To: babble-on
Yay for Gay, Promo for Homo is okay with you.
168
posted on
08/07/2012 9:01:55 AM PDT
by
Darksheare
(Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
To: xzins
Sounds more like Romney came out in favor of freedom of association.
169
posted on
08/07/2012 9:02:16 AM PDT
by
jimfree
(In Nov 2012 my 12 y/o granddaughter will have more relevant executive experience than Barack Obama)
To: muawiyah
Do you actually understand how silly you sound?
170
posted on
08/07/2012 9:05:22 AM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(Spend your time more wisely, like phonebanking for Mourdock ...)
To: xzins
Boy Scouts current policy prohibiting open homosexuals from serving as members and leaders.
Leaders yeah right --They are there because that is where the boys are---Anyone who thinks otherwise is naive fool
171
posted on
08/07/2012 9:05:56 AM PDT
by
uncbob
To: jimfree
True conservatives may see it that way, however, with the persistent and ever present public pressure on the BSA to modify their position, his public position is on the wrong side of this issue. Liberals, queers and their supporters will see it as one more “ally” in their quest to destroy the BSA.
Just more “dominoes” falling in line with the queer agenda to open up a target rich environment for queers.
At what point will the public pressure from queers and their hetero supporters become too much for the BSA to resist? Where’s the tipping point?
172
posted on
08/07/2012 9:07:51 AM PDT
by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political party's in the long run gave away our liberty.)
To: WKUHilltopper
See? This guy is not different than Obama. Hes a puke like the rest of them.
173
posted on
08/07/2012 9:07:51 AM PDT
by
Ron H.
(Ahh, how's that multi-culturism thing working out for you these days?!)
To: xzins; All
A Romney spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, said in an e-mail that this remains Romney's position today. What was quoted to the Romney camp? Was it the part about supporting the Boy Scouts deciding their own rules, disagreeing with their policy or both? See, we don't get a fresh quote here. We're asked to accept the word of the AP (or homosexual bloggers) that they're truthfully representing the Romney campaign.
"Trust but verify" used to be a motto, now it's shoot first and keep shooting in the circular firing squad until Obama wins again.
To: VeniVidiVici
I want to see Romneys lips move saying that he supports gay men and woemen serving as leaders in the Boy Scouts.Here's your chance to see Romney say it:
Romney in 1994
This is the 1994 comment, when Romney was on the National Executive Board of the BSA. I'm not aware of anything directly from Romney saying this is still his position, except for a quote attributed to his campaign spokesman.
175
posted on
08/07/2012 9:09:57 AM PDT
by
Scoutmaster
(You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
To: xzins; SandRat
Didn’t see you on this thread yet SR, so ping-a-ling!
176
posted on
08/07/2012 9:11:27 AM PDT
by
SZonian
(Throwing our allegiances to political party's in the long run gave away our liberty.)
To: so_real; All
Right I’m going to waste my vote on the loser Virgil Goode..
177
posted on
08/07/2012 9:13:34 AM PDT
by
KevinDavis
(Virgil Goode and other 3rd party candidates are losers!!!!)
To: jimfree
Sounds like he said that all people regardless of sexual orientation should be able to participate. His words: I feel that all people should be able to participate in the Boy Scouts regardless of their sexual orientation.
Does that sound like freedom of association to you???
178
posted on
08/07/2012 9:16:20 AM PDT
by
xzins
(Vote Goode Not Evil: The lesser of 2 evils is still evil!)
To: Steamburg
Big surprise, people dont like his honesty if they disagree with his position. Promoting homosexuality is the ONLY thing he has been consistent and honest about in his entire political career.
Claiming Romney, a man that flip-flops like Bill Clinton, is honest is the most absurd comment I have seen in quite some time.
179
posted on
08/07/2012 9:20:29 AM PDT
by
Kazan
(Mitt Romney: The greater of two evils)
To: xzins
"Romney is not the only choice that conservatives have."
- Choice 1: A guy who is on 17 ballots, and will be lucky to make 18, and luckier still to pull 0.5% of the popular vote
- Choice 2: A Freeper who is on zero ballots and has a better chance of hitting the lottery
- Choice 3: A write-in candidacy for a woman who doesn't want the job
Welcome to Realville.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160, 161-180, 181-200 ... 421-428 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson