Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MEGoody; GlockThe Vote; gore_sux; scooby321; WILLIALAL; sickoflibs; Inconvenient Truthteller; ...
87 posted on Mon Aug 20 2012 10:20:13 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by MEGoody: “So how should he have handled that very direction question on abortion in cases of rape? So far, no one has been able to provide an alternative response, let alone one that the MSM would not have jumped on with both feet.”

The best answer to a direct media question like this is, in my opinion, something like this: “We don't have capital punishment for rapists or for men who commit incest; in fact, under current laws they'll usually be out of prison in only a few years. Why have capital punishment for the innocent baby involved?”

23 posted on Mon Aug 20 2012 07:52:23 GMT-0500 (Central Daylight Time) by GlockThe Vote: “That jerk needs to step down asap and let Steelman run and win.”

What Akin said about the physiology of fertilization and implantation in rape cases, even if true, is irrelevant to the moral issues involved. That was a dumb statement.

Now as for who the best candidate was — I live in Missouri. I've interviewed Sarah Steelman and Todd Akin. Sarah Steelman was my state senator before she was elected to statewide office.

Republican voters had reasons for rejecting Steelman and Brunner and voting instead for Akin. Among them were Akin’s strong Christian conservative position. We knew what we were getting and now we need to deal with it. You may not agree, and that's fine, but Akin is the nominee so your choices are McCaskill, Akin, or a third-party vote for a candidate who has no chance of getting elected.

How you decide is up to you.

123 posted on 08/20/2012 10:28:52 AM PDT by darrellmaurina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: darrellmaurina; MEGoody; GlockThe Vote; stephenjohnbanker; mkjessup; DoughtyOne; Gilbo_3; NFHale; ..
RE :”Republican voters had reasons for rejecting Steelman and Brunner and voting instead for Akin. Among them were Akin’s strong Christian conservative position. We knew what we were getting and now we need to deal with it. You may not agree, and that's fine, but Akin is the nominee so your choices are McCaskill, Akin, or a third-party vote for a candidate who has no chance of getting elected.
How you decide is up to you.

I don't have to decide because I don't live in MO and I don't know enough about the primary race to comment on what you should do directly.

But I can tell you that if ‘strong Christian conservative positions’ like abortion was the primary reason they voted for him then they should more upset than others,
This guy will the Dems poster boy for ‘free taxpayer abortions by the federal government’ and every Republican who opposes free abortions will be dragged down by his stupid comment and accused of being a 'Akin like' woman hater.

Didnt he ever hear of TV and other electric media? Did he think the interview/he was in a closed forum anti-abortion fundraiser?

139 posted on 08/20/2012 10:48:42 AM PDT by sickoflibs (Romney is still a liberal. Just watch him. (Obama-ney Care ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson