The child attempting to play the roll of a man. That is all he is. An infant in life. An infant in knowledge. An infant in leadership. An infant in decision making. An amateur in the White House. This is what we have now. Basically, when you really look around the political landscape these days, we do not have “statesmen” or “leaders”. We are STUCK with “politicians.”
I would dig very deep to contribute to such a cause.
On March 12-13, 2003, the Illinois state senate committee chaired by Senator Barack Obama amended the proposed state Born-Alive Infants Protection bill (SB 1082) to exactly track the language of the already-enacted federal BAIPA, by adopting Senate Amendment No. 1, 10-0. The committee then voted to kill the amended bill, 6-4, with Obama and the other Democrats on the committee voting against it. The bill that Obama and his colleges voted to kill, as amended, was virtually identical to the federal law. The entirely non-substantive points at which the state bill language still differed from the federal law are shown in brackets below (except we have ignored differences in capitalizing).
I doubt Romney or the RNC would ever touch something this controversial, but it would be perfect for an independent ad by a pro-life pac: imagine the line below repeated several times (along with a graphic providing a tally of all the black children aborted during Obama’s time in government):
” . . . if that fetus, or child however way you want to describe it is now outside the mothers womb and the doctor continues to think that its nonviable but theres, lets say, movement or some indication that, in fact, theyre not just out limp and dead . . . they’re not just out limp and dead . . . they’re not just out limp and dead . . . “
If you think the donkey’s howled like stuck pigs after the ads pointing out how BO gutted welfare reform, imagine how’d they’d respond to an ad describing Obama’s view of infant abortion survivors.
Did he support “legitimate murder”?