Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 08/23/2012 3:20:52 PM PDT by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: NYer

The child attempting to play the roll of a man. That is all he is. An infant in life. An infant in knowledge. An infant in leadership. An infant in decision making. An amateur in the White House. This is what we have now. Basically, when you really look around the political landscape these days, we do not have “statesmen” or “leaders”. We are STUCK with “politicians.”


41 posted on 08/23/2012 5:37:10 PM PDT by RetiredArmy (The Signs of the Times are clear. The days grow short. Your only way to avoid is BELIEVE in Him!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
I just hope someone, somewhere, decides to make this an issue (it should have been in 08 had the wuss McPain or the RNC chosen to) and decides to run ads throughout the country.

I would dig very deep to contribute to such a cause.

43 posted on 08/23/2012 5:44:54 PM PDT by neveralib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Comparison of the Illinois and federal BAIPA bills

On March 12-13, 2003, the Illinois state senate committee chaired by Senator Barack Obama amended the proposed state Born-Alive Infants Protection bill (SB 1082) to exactly track the language of the already-enacted federal BAIPA, by adopting Senate Amendment No. 1, 10-0. The committee then voted to kill the amended bill, 6-4, with Obama and the other Democrats on the committee voting against it. The bill that Obama and his colleges voted to kill, as amended, was virtually identical to the federal law. The entirely non-substantive points at which the state bill language still differed from the federal law are shown in brackets below (except we have ignored differences in capitalizing).


46 posted on 08/23/2012 5:58:19 PM PDT by rhema ("Break the conventions; keep the commandments." -- G. K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

I doubt Romney or the RNC would ever touch something this controversial, but it would be perfect for an independent ad by a pro-life pac: imagine the line below repeated several times (along with a graphic providing a tally of all the black children aborted during Obama’s time in government):

” . . . if that fetus, or child – however way you want to describe it – is now outside the mother’s womb and the doctor continues to think that its nonviable but there’s, lets say, movement or some indication that, in fact, they’re not just out limp and dead . . . they’re not just out limp and dead . . . they’re not just out limp and dead . . . “

If you think the donkey’s howled like stuck pigs after the ads pointing out how BO gutted welfare reform, imagine how’d they’d respond to an ad describing Obama’s view of infant abortion survivors.


48 posted on 08/23/2012 6:17:29 PM PDT by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer

Did he support “legitimate murder”?


49 posted on 08/23/2012 6:26:12 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Only Obama put a dog on the roof of his mouth. Dogs are friends, not food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: NYer
Pinged from Terri Dailies


59 posted on 09/02/2012 10:40:47 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson