Posted on 09/18/2012 1:50:11 PM PDT by servo1969
“The only place he needs to respond a little differently is on the issue of that percentage of the 47% (elderly, military, etc.) that don’t pay taxes but will vote his way.”
Yep, I agree, just a slight adjustment to his message would be helpful. I live in a very conservative area, but the median income is not all that high. Not everyone who pays no federal income taxes is automatically for Obama. Believe it or not, I know a lot of poor Republicans. Otherwise, he is spot on. I am beginning to think he might be a closet conservative.
I don’t think you need worry. We saw what team willard was made of during the primaries. They’re vicious, mean, nasty alinskyites. Machiavellian to the core.
And if willard wasn’t such a proabort lib, i’d be in heaven by about now.
That’s right...”all” people,
Except... bitter clingers, doctors who amputate for the hell of it, the Chamber of Commerce, households making over $250,000, the entire coal industry, oil drillers, catholics, private medical practices, private hospitals, unborn babies, just-born babies, the military, small businesses, big businesses, fat cats, jet flying CEOs, young workers,all non-unionized workers....(and on and on and on)
Strategery + Schadenfreude = Stratenshardenfreudery
He’s still talking like a wuss though which means he is going to LOSE if he doesn’t toughen up. Hey Mitt: It’s called MARXISM! USE THE WORD! Tell the history of it, tell how many MILLIONS have died because of it, how many have starved to death because of it. Don’t say “I disagree” like you’re having a discussion with a child! Give me a freaking break with this guy! ARRRGH!
Don’t fall for this! Romney is the enemy! Vote third party or for Sarah!
(right?)
Yes, it is! Romney is no better than 0bama! ROMNEY IS THE ENEMY! Vote 3rd party or write in a worthy person, instead!!
(right?)
I’d love to see an ad from a Romney PAC that is simply a continuous loop of Obama lowlights like “You didn’t build that”, “I just want to redistribute some wealth”, “End the Bush tax cuts” with some “God (bleep) America” from his pastor. Maybe some “bitter clinger” talk mixed in.
No narrative. No explanation. Just rapid fire quotes.
Let’s get behind Mitt to defeat Obama, but let’s not suppose he won’t disappoint us. He needs to do two things:
1. turn the economy around.
2. Give us a solid 6-3 majority of Constitutionalists on our SC (more like Thomas and less like Roberts & they should be in their early 50s, too).
We need to hold the Congress for at least a generation. It would also be in our best interest to ally with minority conservatives and draw more minorities into the GOP. Alan West, Mia Love, Marco Rubio et al. will do more to keep us in power than Romney ever will.
” put the Rats on defense all the way to the debates. “ ...... 24/7 up until election day.
I’m missing it. To what end? To further cement his reputation with those who would vote against obastard anyway?
What do you think the genius of it is?
Romney had no problem with vicious attacks on his primary rivals. It’s about time he and his team actually go after the real enemy.
But he’ll probably be out there tomorrow telling us once again what a nice guy Obama is and how much he respects him. Barf.
Quit calling it WEALTH! It is not just WEALTH that obastard wants to redistribute it is ALL EARNINGS AND PROPERTY.
Hear, hear! That is a brilliant and crucial point.
Today Rush was making the argument that in spite of all the hoopla of the media hyperventilating and salivating on their hopes of “ GOTCHA “ on Romney’s comments about only 47 % pay taxes, that the liberals, Obama, the media will turn this election out of a class warfare argument anyway... it was bound to happen anyway.
Romney needs to patch things up with his non-wealthy base. Most of the (few) people I know who are voting for him are not well off and probably live on Social Security and veteran’s benefits of some kind. They’re not sponges.
Mitt has been pretty damn strong on Conservative values.
He has said the things that need to be said — and will be held to it (unlike libtards who only care about words not actions).
Is FR still against Mitt?
Good analysis. I for one am not against him. He has enough problems
Dealing with the disgraceful MSM
and hes a damn genius for it
I think you are right. Mitt could not have unaware of the Carter grandspawn in attendance at the event. The specific wording he used made attempts at creative editing still leave his message intact. And too boot...a new youtube user uploaded the obama "redistribution" video today.
The beat them at their own game by using their quite predictable behavior against them is brilliant. It's almost like Sarah herself set it all up for him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.