Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Party registration by state.

Posted on 09/19/2012 6:35:35 PM PDT by Jaguarmike

This is the latest party registration I could find by state. It was taken by Gallup in February. I think it's important to take into consideration how the current polls are weighted. For example, if we were looking at a presidential poll for New York State, a D+20 advantage would seem logical. But in the swing states, neither party has a major advantage.

Now, according to a personal poll taken by Dick Morris, there was a massive switch to Democrats after their convention. But Morris said he expected that advantage to fade before the election.

At any rate, here's the data from last winter. Hope the link works.

http://www.gallup.com/poll/152438/states-move-gop-2011.aspx


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 09/19/2012 6:35:37 PM PDT by Jaguarmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Jaguarmike

You might have to cut and paste the link. But it’s worth it.


2 posted on 09/19/2012 6:36:39 PM PDT by Jaguarmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarmike

http://www.gallup.com/poll/152438/states-move-gop-2011.aspx


3 posted on 09/19/2012 6:38:24 PM PDT by mountn man (Happiness is not a destination, its a way of life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

Thanks!


4 posted on 09/19/2012 6:40:56 PM PDT by Jaguarmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mountn man

Dems have 0 advantage in Virginia. A -3 disadvantage in Colorado. In other swing states, the advantage is nowhere near double digits. Around three or four. Grab the poll garbage can. There’s a lot to throw out.


5 posted on 09/19/2012 6:46:19 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon

The Democrats have a .3 advantage in Ohio, and not even a 2 point advantage in Florida. And as a native Floridian, I know a lot of North Florida registered Democrats are actually conservative and vote GOP.


6 posted on 09/19/2012 6:55:58 PM PDT by Jaguarmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarmike; All; Izzy Dunne
Great post by Izzy Dunne, who says he merely transmitted it from someone else's blog to FR...but it is excellent:

Great post by Izzy:

For the last two weeks we have been treated to the narrative that Barack Obama is surging at the polls, Mitt Romney is in trouble and unless there is a massive change in direction it is all over.

Simply put this is a lie.

Of all the polls you have seen, there is one poll that has gotten no attention, it is a poll that has been taken monthly, it is a poll that Doug Ross spotted and promoted on his site. It is the Rasmussen Poll of party identification.

They have party identification results online dating back to 2004. Here are the 2012 numbers through August

That shows a GOP advantage in registration this year but you might say: “Hey, Datechguy, you’ve been hitting polls all year, why can’t THIS poll be wrong?”

That’s a good question, we can answer it by asking another question: Does this poll of party identification correspond with the results of national elections?

Lets take a look:

2004 George Bush wins re-election

The closest the Republicans come to democrats in registration is Sept at a .6 in September. On election day Democrats had a registration advantage of 1.5. Yet not only did George Bush win re-election with that disadvantage but the GOP took 3 senate seats and 3 House seats over 2002.

2006 Midterms Revenge of the left:

In January the GOP was the closest they would be .6 off but by November the Mark Foley scandal was still big news and on election day Democrats had a spread of 6.1 points. This carried them to a net gain of 31 house seats & 5 seats.

2008 The coming of Barack Obama

The year of hope and change. The closest split was 5.6 in January & in September after the Palin Pick but by election day not only was the split 7.6 for Dems but for the first time (Feb) A party had identification over 40%. The Democrats kept that number over 40% 8 out of 12 months that year reaching a high of 41.7% the largest number in this 9 year sample for either party. With these figures it’s should be no surprise that Barack Obama win but Democrats picked up 8 seats in the Senate & 21 Seats in the house.

2010 Midterms The Rise of the Tea Party

2010 proved conclusively that timing is everything for the first time in the nine years, the GOP took an advantage in poll registration from -2.9 to plus 1.3 in one month, and that month was November.

Additionally the 37.0 figure for the GOP was the highest for the party since Dec 2004. At the very same time the 33.7 figure in December was the lowest figure for democrats EVER.

Correspondingly the GOP gained 6 Senate seats (not counting the Jan Scott Brown Race) and in the house picked up 63 seats more than democrats picked up in 2006 & 2008 combined.

These results since 2004 seem to indicate the poll is reliable. So what has it said lately, lets start with 2011 lets look at 2011

This is the year of the great fights between the GOP House & the president and it’s the most interesting year of the lot. The lead changes hands 6 times during the year as the country tries to figure out what it wants and for the first time EVER Other was in the lead, (Aug) tied with the GOP (33.5) ahead of democrats (33.0) other was ahead of the GOP 3 times in 2007.

Now lets look at that 2012 chart again:

At no time during the year do the Democrats have a registration advantage vs republicans, the gap closes in July & re-separates in August. The low point for the GOP was July for 34.9 and the high August at 37.6 For democrats the high was 34.0 in June & July the low was 32.4 in Feb

What does this mean for November? It means a lot.

The Democrats won 2 election in this period 2006 & 2008 with a 6.9 advantage in 2006 & a 7.6 advantage in 2008.

There is no example of the Democrats winning since 2004 with an advantage less that 6.9.

The GOP won two elections in this period 2004 with a -1.6 disadvantage & 2010 with a 1.3 advantage. This means the GOP has proven it can win with not only a small lead but with an actual disadvantage. Additionally with an advantage of only 1.3 they pulled off the biggest house swing in my lifetime.

Can these number change? Well the biggest 1 month swing I’ve seen is 4.2 Oct-Nov in 2010 the biggest 3 month swing was Dec 2007-Feb 2008 6.9 in favor of Democrats at the rise of Obama.

Tell me with the economy in the tank, and the new trouble in the Middle East, what is the prospect of a swing of that size to the Democrats happening again right now? Moreover even if that record registration swing repeated itself right now this would give democrats an advantage of only 2.6 points.

I’ve covered a lot of national polls on this site over the last year and all those polls ABC, CBS, NBC, FOX have one thing in common.

Not a single one of those polls had a sample with a GOP advantage.

As Rush would say: Zip, Zero Nada.

Not only have none of these polls had a GOP advantage but the closest we saw was a D+4 poll.

Doug Ross via (@NumbersMuncher & @AriFleischer) has a great chart on his site that I’ll reprint here:

In every single poll showing Barack Obama ahead on this chart the sample is at least D+4 Even if the biggest swing in history takes place in the next 3 months toward the left that is 1.4 points above what the party split will be.

All of the figures I’ve cited are from a source publicly available. The Media know these figures, the left knows these figures and the Networks know these figures.

Yet they are still using polls with huge democrat samples and representing them as real.

I don’t know what that tells you but I sure know what it tells me

“Ride right through them, they’re demoralized as hell”!

The election of Barack Obama was the biggest con ever perpetuated on the US Public, the polls the media is reporting these days is a close second.

Update: CBS belowns itself, D+13 REALLY?

7 posted on 09/19/2012 7:06:06 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jaguarmike
Party registrations seldom matter in primaries. Some registered as Dim to boost the challenger to Obama. I think he got 40+% to Obamas 50=%. It didn't matter as they annulled our those votes due to a "technicality". Even though the challenger followed everything to a tee as to what was required of him.
8 posted on 09/19/2012 7:14:06 PM PDT by BipolarBob (Biden: "HOPE and CHAINS for all 57 states".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

Wonderful, informative post. Do you think we’ll see a surge of Democratic registration in the next month?


9 posted on 09/20/2012 9:03:59 AM PDT by Jaguarmike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson