Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In Libya, Security Was Lax Before Attack That Killed U.S. Ambassador, Officials Say
The Washington Post ^ | Saturday, September 29, 2012 | Ernesto Londono and Abigail Hauslohner

Posted on 09/30/2012 11:38:16 AM PDT by kristinn

On the eve of his death, U.S. Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens was ebullient as he returned for the first time in his new role to Benghazi, the eastern Libyan city that embraced him as a savior during last year’s civil war. He moved around the coastal town in an armored vehicle and held a marathon of meetings, his handful of bodyguards trailing discreetly behind.

But as Stevens met with Benghazi civic leaders, U.S. officials appear to have underestimated the threat facing both the ambassador and other Americans. They had not reinforced the U.S. diplomatic outpost there to meet strict safety standards for government buildings overseas. Nor had they posted a U.S. Marine detachment, as at other diplomatic sites in high-threat regions.

A U.S. military team assigned to establish security at the new embassy in Tripoli, in a previously undisclosed detail, was never instructed to fortify the temporary hub in the east. Instead, a small local guard force was hired by a British private security firm as part of a contract worth less than half of what it costs to deploy a single U.S. service member in a war zone for a year.

The two U.S. compounds where Stevens and three other Americans were killed in a sustained, brutal attack the night of Sept. 11, proved to be strikingly vulnerable targets in an era of barricaded embassies and multibillion-dollar security contracts for U.S. diplomatic facilities in conflict zones, according to interviews with U.S. and Libyan officials and eyewitnesses in recent days.

Cautioned to be low-key

Days before the ambassador arrived from the embassy in Tripoli, a Libyan security official had warned an American diplomat that foreigners should keep a low profile in Benghazi because of growing threats. Other Westerners had fled the city, and the British had closed their consulate.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: benghazi; benghazigate; christopherstevens; libya

1 posted on 09/30/2012 11:38:24 AM PDT by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kristinn

duh, the dust ain’t even settled from the civil war


2 posted on 09/30/2012 11:44:36 AM PDT by yldstrk (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
It was not lax as they would have us to believe it was intentional.
Knowing now that they had what ? 24 hours ? 48 hours ? notice ? premeditated.
3 posted on 09/30/2012 11:44:36 AM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

4 posted on 09/30/2012 11:47:40 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland United States. There would be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Constitutionalist

This was not about “lax”. This was a Commandante Zero kidnapping that went awry. The thugs were supposed to come in and “kidnap” our ambassador, in a mini redux of Tehran 1979. Then Zero would have “negotiated Steven’s release”. Instead, other, bigger thugs got in on the action and raped and killed him.


5 posted on 09/30/2012 12:02:54 PM PDT by kabumpo (Kabumpo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Security wasn't lax. Security was nonexistent. Ambassador Stevens and three others are dead as the result. The buck stops with SecState Hillary(!) and POTUS.
6 posted on 09/30/2012 12:08:52 PM PDT by MasterGunner01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
In Libya, Security Was Lax Before Attack That Killed U.S. Ambassador, Officials Say

LAX? Personally I think it was done on purpose because this administration doesn't give a bleep. Secondly, Stevens was gay - he should have had triple protection on a daily basis.

7 posted on 09/30/2012 12:09:27 PM PDT by rockabyebaby (We are sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo screwed!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabumpo
Now they are saying that he sent in Marines and helicopters to rescue them out of the embassy... Shades of 1979 all over again.

Or it could have been a deal or negotiations gone totally wrong.
8 posted on 09/30/2012 12:10:12 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: MasterGunner01

“Security wasn’t lax. Security was nonexistent. Ambassador Stevens and three others are dead as the result. The buck stops with SecState Hillary(!) and POTUS.”

____

Roger That.


9 posted on 09/30/2012 12:14:27 PM PDT by mongo141 (Revolution ver. 2.0, just a matter of when, not a matter of if!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: kristinn
Congress was warned about Libya last month
10 posted on 09/30/2012 12:48:23 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kristinn

Article from 2011. I am wondering what others think? Could there be a connection? http://www.thenation.com/blog/161552/presidents-libya-war-undeclared-unconstitutional-unnecessary


11 posted on 10/01/2012 2:54:57 PM PDT by Ohiobelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson