Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sakic
So, if one shoots an unarmed man we should take his word for it.

Unless you have proof otherwise.

I take it you don't like the idea of being innocent until proven guilty?

You would prefer a system in which you are presumed guilty and must prove your innocence?

151 posted on 10/12/2012 9:15:21 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (That was sarcasm, you moron.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies ]


To: E. Pluribus Unum

I wrote that I did not know the truth here, just like you don’t. You are assuming the shooter is innocent. Did you think OJ was innocent before the trial? Just curious.


152 posted on 10/12/2012 10:16:20 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson