Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TigerClaws

Hillary is going to fall on the sword for Obama? She is the most self-centered and brazenly ambitious woman on the left.

What’s the punch line? And we ALL know there IS one...


9 posted on 10/15/2012 8:24:46 PM PDT by 13Sisters76 ("It is amazing how many people mistake a certain hip snideness for sophistication. " Thos. Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 13Sisters76
What’s the punch line? And we ALL know there IS one...

She has a bigger pair than does the "O" man? And they aren't in some da#n lockbox.

Regards,
GtG

21 posted on 10/15/2012 8:54:39 PM PDT by Gandalf_The_Gray (I live in my own little world, I like it 'cuz they know me here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: 13Sisters76

This sordid and venal scandal does have a certain “curiouser and curiouser” Wonderland quality to it.
I’m thinking they were all trying to stall until November 7th, and it blew up in their faces due to the “We own the media” Democrat arrogance.
Maybe now, failing in that, they’re hoping to ventilate this outhouse just enough to secure pardons before Zero is shown the door in January.


23 posted on 10/15/2012 9:04:11 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: 13Sisters76

Hillary falls on Obama’s sword because Obama’s enablers, who happen to be Hillary’s enablers also, have told her to do so. This whole cabal of Chicago connected to internationalists who want the USA to go down the tubes needs to be thoroughly vetted/outed, especially Axelrod and his heritage connections to Bolshevik Russians.Perhaps Khrushchev knew more than what he was telling in his ‘bury’ comment.


31 posted on 10/15/2012 9:54:04 PM PDT by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

To: 13Sisters76
What’s the punch line? And we ALL know there IS one...

The punch line is right in front of you. Hillary claims responsibility for security while leaving the rest of the entire mess out on the table - so it then flows towards Obama.

She figures if she cops to part of it, then the presumption is that she copped to everything that applied to her - that people (or the media) can't then say, "wait a minute, you were responsible for a hell of a lot more than just security, and anyway, what are the details of that security failure - what were you thinking and planning in failing to even respond to repeated requests of more security by an ambassador in a war zone"?

See? That can't be asked now. No questions. She makes them all seem moot - she "took responsibility," so nothing more can be said. Issue ends there. That way she dodges questions, and lets the rest (all) of it slide onto Obama.

Of course, it's the cheapest of tricks that only works on the stupidest of people. But who do you think liberals are?

33 posted on 10/15/2012 10:13:11 PM PDT by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson