Yeah yeah yeah...
Like anyone is going to listen to (or believe) a word this guy says.
Yap all you want, nobody cares.
Circle the wagons. If there was such a thing a journalistic ethics left, she would have been fired right after leaving the debate stage. And I’d say the same thing if a moderator did this to Obama. This shouldn’t be like pro wrestling where an actively and obviously biased referee is an active part of the game.
What the H? So now the "Equal Results" crowd is giving extra credit for slow speakers because it's not their fault they don't think as fast?
Candy needs to fall on her sword.
It will be effective enough to have Obama back in the lead on Gallup by next Monday.
It will be a cold day in Al Gores nghtmares before Candy gets another gig as moderator when a republican is debating.
After Candy’s performance last evening, I’m beginning to think I was mistaken about what ‘the CNN’ stood for.
Pat Caddell slams the media: They have become an “enemy of the people” (video 26:00)
The Media will not report the truth!
1 - Per debate rules Crowley was not to interject herself into the conversation since the candidates were addressing members of the public. (hmmm)
2 - Crowley actually asked the question that started the exchange vs. a member of the audience. (hmmm)
3 - Crowley had a piece of paper that she waved as she “corrected” Romney and Obama asked Crowley to “read the transcript” even before she indicated that it was indeed a copy of Obama’s Sep. 12 speech. (hmmm)
4 - Crowley clearly took Obama’s cue when he deigned that he would gladly talk more foreign affairs BUT...and Crowley ended the segment. (hmmm)
5 - The audience was prompted to applause by someone. M. Obama may have started it (that would be doubly scandalous) but we know for a fact now via a CNN reporter herself that she did applaud. (hmmm)
All-in-all it was clearly an activist act by Crowley that probably was not a whispered conspiracy between her and Obama but simply an obvious leg up in the form of a softball to allow Obama to spout his “outrage” and, when the opportunity arose, to counter Romney.
This is not 2008. More and more people are seeing the obvious pro-Dem bias in the media in general and pick up on the cues a lot easier. It has become more instinctual. Even if you were a pro-Obama person you would have be self-delusional to not see a level of favoritism in that particular exchange.
The fact that Crowley essentially rescinded her interjection and agreed that Romney was right will be very useful in the next debate on Oct. 22. This debate, format-wise, is the same as the first but is strictly foreign policy. If the Obama camp really thinks that this stunt by Crowley has put them in a better position for a 90-minute debate on foreign policy (and the last time the candidate will be seen together) they are gravely mistaken. This became the most memorable moment of the night and still, as an issue, is not only completely unresolved but has only added more fuel to the fire.
LOL
HOW did Obama KNOW that Crowley had the Rose Garden TRANSCRIPT at her desk??????
TMZ is a gossip site but see lots of anti-Candy Crowly comments there. Lots of anti-Obama and pro-Romney comments