Huge loss for Romney in my opinion. He had to be aggressive and wasn’t- the polls do not justify such a passive performance. He didn’t attack when he should have and he didn’t respond effectively when attacked. Unbelievably frustrating. Hopefully I am completely wrong. Wonder what Krauthammer thinks.
Now Wallace says that Romney was right about the Iraq Status or Forces agreement exchange, but you sure as hell wouldn’t have known that from the debate itself because Romney didn’t bother to vigorously defend the truth. AND THAT IS INDEFENSIBLE.
Charlie will probably agree with you. That will get him into beltway dinner parties through the end of the year.
Ummm no he did not.
Kraut thinks you are completely wrong.
He thinks Romney won big. Admitted he would have went after Obama big over Libya, but Romney played it very well anyways, and thought that's why Romney is running for Pres, and he's just a talking head. Heh.
Kraut thinks you are completely wrong.