"Interesting polling numbers from Ohio" (article @ unskewedpolls.com - why not to fear for OHIO)

unskewedpolls.com ^ | Oct 24 2012 | DEAN CHAMBERS

[profit_guy]

I agree if it stayed at 6,000 in-persons or “down only 40%”, as of Oct 15th. But if it matches or exceeds the 2008 total of 10,400 from Oct 15th up to the deadline will you be concerned? What is the point of concern? Again I am trying trying to be argumentative, rather I want to understand and it seems like that 2,200 in-persons info may be wrong and there is no point making assumptions off incorrect data.

[LS]

Yes, I would b but you ar missing a key concept. The 10,000 was for whatever date my source had (could be several days earlier than Oct. 15), as the 10,000 will go up too, as more early votes came in after Oct 15 2008---a lot more.

I will get more info today, but here is what I honk accounts for the discrepancy between the 6000 and 2200: first, there were a couple of additional days in the Oct 15 number and th 2200,and I bet one of them is the period in which Obama came to town and a number of the 9000 D supporters had to get tickets @ election HQ where MANY were registered and voted on the spot. The Romney state chairman sent a campaign memo yesterday confirming that Rs % of early/ absentee vote is Much higher than in 08 and that enthusiasm up in all counties.