Great Read!
Read the comments at the original site.
When the "news" media start to make references to Watergate about Benghazi, it's almost SHTF time (I hope)!
Even if Nixon had sat in the Oval Office watching live video of four American ambassadors being tortured and butchered and several U.S. military being overrun and killed.. Watergate still would not be the same.. vis-a-vis the MSM.
The MSM was in a frenzy for weeks and weeks.. sometimes the network TV evening news had no other stories; and nary a newspaper frontpage above the fold was absent a Watergate story for weeks.
I clearly remember those days and still ask
What the hell did Nixon do that JFK and LBJ did not do?
The coverup.. OK that's right but don't who know that the f'in' MSM DID NOT QUESTION JFK and LBJ TO AN EXTENT THAT THEY HAD TO BOTHER TO COVERUP. Later that changed for LBJ as the "anti-war," pro-Ho demonstrators took over much of the MSM.. but LBJ was never opposed on anything but the war.
The fact that CBS cut this from the broadcast -- airing instead Mr. Obama's attack on Mitt Romney for criticizing his Middle East policy -- indicates why the White House remains confident the "mainstream" media will continue to downplay the scandal.
--snip--
Appeals to their integrity are unlikely to get "mainstream" journalists to do their jobs, since they have so little of it. Self preservation may. The leaked emails expose journalists who touted the administration's story as gullible chumps, corrupt shills, or both.
The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette has at least one writer worth reading.
Appeals to their integrity are unlikely to get "mainstream" journalists to do their jobs, since they have so little of it. Self preservation may. The leaked emails expose journalists who touted the administration's story as gullible chumps, corrupt shills, or both.
This appeared in a newspaper? Good. Good for them.... finally.
I have the feeling you’ll enjoy reading this...