Tipping them off? What, the terrorist Islamic jihadists had no idea those were AMERICANS they were attacking?
We sure kept them from having the least clue about how or what to engage.
Not as if we were painting a target on their mortars or anything. And surely not as if we were in a fix where personnel had to be extracted for their own safety.
This is not merely lame. Both legs are cut off at the knees, there is a large gaping abdominal wound, and blood is streaming over both eyes, as the head explodes.
The NYT continues to willingly cover for our inept administration. They could have withheld specific names/information and still called the attack a terrorist action. Obama has sold out to the Muslim Brotherhood and was smuggling arms to them by way of Benghazi. Obama did not want to upset those activities and wanted to sweep the attack under the rug as a one time demonstration. It has been now over two months with no administration actions or resolution provided to the American general public. If it were not for the Petraeus sex scandal, Benghazi would be old news....just what the NYT is trying to do now. The death of the NYT can’t come soon enough for me.. Until then, it is just another political news outlet fo Obama.
The NYT continues to willingly cover for our inept administration. They could have withheld specific names/information and still called the attack a terrorist action. Obama has sold out to the Muslim Brotherhood and was smuggling arms to them by way of Benghazi. Obama did not want to upset those activities and wanted to sweep the attack under the rug as a one time demonstration. It has been now over two months with no administration actions or resolution provided to the American general public. If it were not for the Petraeus sex scandal, Benghazi would be old news....just what the NYT is trying to do now. The death of the NYT can’t come soon enough for me.. Until then, it is just another political news outlet fo Obama.
The NYT continues to willingly cover for our inept administration. They could have withheld specific names/information and still called the attack a terrorist action. Obama has sold out to the Muslim Brotherhood and was smuggling arms to them by way of Benghazi. Obama did not want to upset those activities and wanted to sweep the attack under the rug as a one time demonstration. It has been now over two months with no administration actions or resolution provided to the American general public. If it were not for the Petraeus sex scandal, Benghazi would be old news....just what the NYT is trying to do now. The death of the NYT can’t come soon enough for me.. Until then, it is just another political news outlet fo Obama.
The president of Libya said immediately that it was a terrorist attack - Al Q claimed it right away - what’s to keep secret?
Yet another layer of lies
Even if that were true, to falsely blame a video put up by an American citizen and put his life in danger is treasonous and an impeachable offense
Nobody had to worry about tipping off anyone after the attack. During it they knew they were being watched. I bet you can find a shot of one of them flipping off the camera in the sky.
since AQ was publicly taking credit, I doubt the administration was trying tohide our knowledge of who did it from AQ. More rational explanation isthey didn’t want public to know that Bambi’ allies had attacked us
So not providing security must have been a ruse, too....just to fool them....right??
This is what the Whitehouse is providing to the media??
since AQ was publicly taking credit, I doubt the administration was trying tohide our knowledge of who did it from AQ. More rational explanation isthey didn’t want public to know that Bambi’ allies had attacked us
Every terrorist KNOWS it is open season on Americans,
thanks to the CRIMINALS in the MSM, and Congress.
Hey Betrayus, you are lying again for your master.
I recall the perps posting / bragging on Facebook after the attack?
OUTSTANDING thread! President Plunder and General Disaster. Twin towers of TREASON.
"I wanted Al Qaeda to think that I was dumb."
On Dec. 8, 1941, the U.S. government announced that there was a spontaneous demonstration in the territory of Hawaii that damaged federal property and, unfortunately, cost several Americans their lives. The demonstration was linked to outrage over the latest Bing Crosby movie.
The director of that film, known to be a shady character, has since been arrested and jailed on unrelated charges.
President Roosevelt assures Americans that he has ordered a full investigation of the matter. He went on to say that the United States government had nothing to do with creating such a disgusting film and fully condemned all “On the Road” movies and fully understood the outrage these movies have caused, especially among the Japanese.
When asked if this were a premeditated, surprise attack, the President said he has ordered a full investigation into the matter but there was no reason to believe that the destruction of much of the United States Navy’s 7th Fleet could be linked to military imperialism in the Pacific.
Sure - the terrorists claim responsibility early on and we wanted to pretend we had no clue it was terrorism. I’m wondering if Zero purposely over-classified the truth of the matter to use it as a hammer if anyone dared speak the truth...
More malarkey!