So it was either:
1. He killed her and stole her guns (illegal)
2. Mom did a straw purchase for son (illegal)
Yet if we banned guns, the crazy couldn’t have obtained the gun or just used a bat, bomb, bow, or anything else to do his evil.
No, he would have purchased one from a local gangbanger.
They can ban guns but worst school disaster so far was by a bomb: 45 killed, 58 injured.
We really need laws to prevent nutjobs from killing little kids. This appears to be an oversight in our legal system.
So it was either:
1. He killed her and stole her guns (illegal)
2. Mom did a straw purchase for son (illegal)
Yet if we banned guns, the crazy couldnt have obtained the gun or just used a bat, bomb, bow, or anything else to do his evil.
Or he could have used his older brother’s ID (which he apparently had) and bought the guns himself. Yes?