Replies

If Brown could not find anything bad to say about a sexually ambiguous and idiotic fake squaw like Warren, how the heck will he find it in his now-craven craw to criticize a genuine Negro, who will be backed by every gay reporter in the country?

bested one Democrat in 2009, and conceivably could again

Perhaps that was Brown's 15 minutes?

maybe, but he should try it. This was a pres election yr and the Obama voters pulled the lever for the squaw too, and maybe getting our “first female Senator” lured them, along with all that advertising and union support (yet she still needs to
raise money to pay off pizza and coffee expenses)

This time it would be a special election.

Last time, Coakley jetted to D.C. to prepare for her
future as a Senator. The election proved otherwise,
and Rachel Maddow had a choked-up voice when she
announced Brown had won. (...how?!?!?!?)

If Brown could not find anything bad to say about a sexually ambiguous and idiotic fake squaw like Warren, how the heck will he find it in his now-craven craw to criticize a genuine Negro, who will be backed by every gay reporter in the country.

By what standard are you saying Brown "couldn't find anything bad to say" about Warren? Obviously, he's not going to say what you said, but by the standards of most political campaigns, he made the points he could make and made them often enough and well enough.

What won the election for Warren was the strong support for Obama in the state -- or the strong dislike for Republicans. Obama won't be on the ballot this time, and Patrick will have to run on his own sorry record of few achievements.

There's certainly no guarantee that Scott Brown will win, but there pretty much is a guarantee that another Republican won't.

Perhaps that was Brown's 15 minutes?

And that was yours just now, I guess. Savor it. It may not get any better than that for you.