Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sen. Feinstein suggests national buyback of guns
Washington Examiner ^ | December 21, 2012 | Joel Gehrke

Posted on 12/24/2012 8:40:00 PM PST by neverdem

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said that she and other gun control advocates are considering a law that would create a program to purchase weapons from gun owners, a proposal that could be compulsory.

“We are also looking at a buy-back program,” Feinstein said today in a press conference. “Now, again, this is a work in progress so these are ideas in the development.”

Gov. Andrew Cuomo, D-N.Y., already discussed the possibility of a buy-back law for his state, but he made clear it would be a forced buyback.

“Confiscation could be an option,” Cuomo told The New York Times yesterday when discussing semiautomatic weapons. “Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

Australia implemented a mandatory buyback program in 1996 following a mass shooting. “The law banned semiautomatic and automatic rifles and shotguns and put in place a mandatory buy-back program for newly banned weapons,” USA Today recalls. “The buyback led to the destruction of 650,000 gun.”

Some liberal activists want the policy imitated here. “That would be like destroying 50 million guns in America today,” the Center for American Progress’ Matt Miller wrote after noting that Australia eliminated 20 percent of the weapons in the country. “The Australian ‘outlaw and repurchase’ option is one approach. But if Congress balks at banning certain weapons entirely, it could make gun owners an offer they can’t refuse. Instead of $200 a gun, Uncle Sam might offer $500.”

Feinstein also said that that former President Bill Clinton had volunteered, on a phone call, to help her get a new gun law passed.

“[Clinton] was talking about the battle back in 1993 with the bill that, interestingly enough, was introduced and passed within the year fo 1993 and went into effect in 1994,” she said. “And, of course, he was president and the White House came alive and was very very helpful in enabling the passage of that bill both in the senate and in the House. So, to have him part of the team again is really quote special for us.”


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 112th; 2012; banglist; bloodoftyrants; bringbodybags; cuomo; democrats; feinstein; govtabuse; guncontrol; molonlabe; nocompromise; nosale; secondamendment; tyranny; willnotbeinfringed; youwillnotdisarmus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-303 next last
To: neverdem

Re: could be compulsory.

These people don’t get it.....not even the sales of the past week are enough to wake them up.


141 posted on 12/25/2012 5:09:39 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Read SCOTUS Castle Rock vs Gonzales before dialing 911!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

if somehow, you can be the person stationed before, and get to inspect and then pay a bit more for some of the valuable ones, this would be a good “buy back”.


142 posted on 12/25/2012 5:10:14 AM PST by VAFreedom (maybe i should take a nap before work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
Australia implemented a mandatory buyback program in 1996 following a mass shooting. “The law banned semiautomatic and automatic rifles and shotguns and put in place a mandatory buy-back program for newly banned weapons,” USA Today recalls. “The buyback led to the destruction of 650,000 gun.”

And... did it reduce criminal use of guns?

143 posted on 12/25/2012 5:12:59 AM PST by John123 (US$ - I owe you nothing. Euro - Who owes you nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

DiFi is part of the Ruling Class. Gun bans apply only to the little people.


144 posted on 12/25/2012 5:14:00 AM PST by ScottinVA (More dizzying than a Tilt-a-Whirl is an around-a-circle argument with a liberal about gun control.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

They have all the momentum they need now. It’s only a matter of time.


145 posted on 12/25/2012 5:24:44 AM PST by wastedyears (I don't want to live on this planet anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: XXXoholic

Our current military might not attack citizens; however, with demographic trends, the future make-up of our military, i believe, will be composed of folks who would love nothing more than to turn their guns on the American public, which is why for the 1st time in my life as someone who has been traditionally pro-military, loved the Reagan build-up in the 80s, etc., now support gutting our military.


146 posted on 12/25/2012 5:33:05 AM PST by MachIV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: old curmudgeon
These people are exactly the reason for the Constitution. They are the very people our founders feared.

Bump

147 posted on 12/25/2012 5:39:41 AM PST by VRW Conspirator (We were the tea party before there was a tea party. - Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
First, it isn't a "buy back"--it was never theirs in the first place, I did not buy it from them, so they can't buy it "back".

“Confiscation could be an option,” Cuomo told The New York Times yesterday when discussing semiautomatic weapons. “Mandatory sale to the state could be an option. Permitting could be an option — keep your gun but permit it.”

No, no, and no. Fuhgeddaboutit. And Cuomo, forget about running for any higher office.

148 posted on 12/25/2012 5:40:59 AM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E. Pluribus Unum

149 posted on 12/25/2012 5:42:37 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

WOW. What a strong and well articulated post!

How sad it has come to this that we have to even think such things in our country..the greatest in the world.


150 posted on 12/25/2012 5:44:40 AM PST by Recovering Ex-hippie (Go Galt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: South40

Which one was it that thought a barrel shroud was a shoulder thing that goes up?


151 posted on 12/25/2012 5:47:07 AM PST by wastedyears (I don't want to live on this planet anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: A Navy Vet

I have written a major essay, title: “Dear Mr. Security Agent: a letter to law enforcement.”

Everything I’ve written over the past decade, including four novels, has been leading up to that essay. I’ll send it out after the new year.

Molon labe.


152 posted on 12/25/2012 5:48:27 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
If the military does not refuse its orders from the Utopians, then the effort to confiscate firearms from the public will result in a civil war over the 2nd amendment

The "shot heard 'round the world" was about the confiscation of guns

...Utopians, perfect name for these fascists

153 posted on 12/25/2012 5:49:39 AM PST by VRW Conspirator (We were the tea party before there was a tea party. - Jim Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

A national gun registration list in 2012-13 is not needed. Data-mining will reveal who owns what, unless you never used a credit card to purchase an ammo mag, rifle sight, case of ammo, etc.

They don’t need you to fill out a registration form saying you own an AR or AK. They will know in two seconds, by your credit card history.


154 posted on 12/25/2012 5:53:52 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

Utopians always cause the worst genocides, because they are convinced they are justified in forcing their vision on an entire society.

Your blood should run cold when our masters tell us we must be disarmed in the name of “public safety.”

During the French Revolution’s “Great Terror,” it was the “Committee of Public Safety” that sent tens of thousands to the guillotine without even a pretense at a trial.

In Turkey, German, the USSR, China etc, gun control / confiscation was always sold as promoting “public safety.”

Ask the Armenians, Jews, Kulaks, “landlords” etc how it worked out, safety-wise.


155 posted on 12/25/2012 6:00:45 AM PST by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Give you my bullets first.


156 posted on 12/25/2012 6:05:03 AM PST by bikerman (What ever happens from now is all OBAMA's fault. Obama lied,economy died)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasRedeye
30 round P-Mag is now $60.00 each on the private market! Good luck with that $500.00 buy back.

But look at our Texas state board ..... and btw, this will not last very long. Demand will bring more mags and weapons to market. And look for the good-quality mags discussed by our fellow Texans in some detail, esp. the Izzy-manufactured ones. Not owning an AR type, I'm not participating in that discussion, but you might be interested.

157 posted on 12/25/2012 6:07:53 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: 1st Division guy
*** in the republik of illinois we have the foid card. lucky us. ***

True, but having a FOID Card doesn't necessarily mean the Card holder owns or 'possesses' a firearm. I've known a few folks who have or had FOID Cards but didn't own a firearm. They'd rent a gun when they went to a range, used a friends gun, or 'planned' to buy a gun but never did. But granted it does give the Gestapo (Geheime Staatspolizei) a place to start looking.

an aside: I have a BATF C&R License so I've been in the G's database for a long time anyway. So for me our STOO-PID IL FOID Card is kinda moot.

158 posted on 12/25/2012 6:11:21 AM PST by Condor51 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; SJackson; Nachum
(Article)
Some liberal activists want the policy imitated here. “That would be like destroying 50 million guns in America today,” the Center for American Progress’ Matt Miller wrote .....

Center for American Progress = George Soros the Jew-Betrayer, the Jew-Finder, the Nazi Collaborator

Moving on our freedom, is he?

159 posted on 12/25/2012 6:12:58 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Captain Compassion; absalom01
This is why I never joined the NRA. I suspect that the government has the NRA membership list and will go after them first.

And why I never applied for a CHL or took a course, and why I don't hang around gun shops or ranges, where the ATF slugs lurk.

If I showed up at a range with something interesting like a Steyr precision rifle or even an SVD, much less a .50-cal. turnbolt, my license plate would be over at ATF before you can say "sic 'em, Dan-O!"

160 posted on 12/25/2012 6:18:15 AM PST by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 301-303 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson