Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Tail Gunner John
Had he been at Gettysburg the CSA might have extended to Brazil by 1900.

Very unlikely. Southerners with this dream weren't thinking it through.

Given the transportation technology of the time, conquest of Mexico, Central America and southward could only be accomplished by sea, as indeed the American conquest in the Mexican War was, after an overland attempt had failed.

For over 50 years a British commitment to opposing slavery had been fundamental. The Royal Navy (not to mention the US Navy) might have had something to contribute to the discussion over whether the CSA would be allowed to conquer its way into a slave empire in Latin America.

30 posted on 01/04/2013 4:54:28 PM PST by Sherman Logan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Sherman Logan

Your observation about the lack of CSA sea power would certainly not be overlooked by Confederate leaders as this was the reason they would have nearly lost the war. The development of the Confederate navy would have been task number one beginning in 1864. I seriously doubt the Democratic leaders in the north would have gone back to war to save Cuba in 1866.


31 posted on 01/04/2013 5:11:31 PM PST by Tail Gunner John
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: Sherman Logan

I believe that if Lincoln had not won re-election in 1864 and The “Peace Democrats” and struck a deal with the south—the second president of the CSA would have been Lee. I believe he would have freed the slaves—in a measured and less traumatic way. Slavery was not a viable system, and would have died out.


42 posted on 01/04/2013 8:47:10 PM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson