Posted on 01/07/2013 2:34:19 PM PST by jimbo123
Evidence of Autism = use of ear plugs. Hmmm. Nope. That is NOT one of the characteristics for Autism as identified in ANY diagnostic instruments or the DSM-IV or DSM-V. Sorry, but thanks for playing.
YOU did, whether intentional or not, attempt to equate Autism with violent rages, as the behavior Lanza engaged in was NOT the wearing of ear plugs, but the murder of 26 people at Sandy Hook, and one person in his mother's home.
I strongly suggest you seek help for your own rage issues.
Yet the Feds said it was an AR 15
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekfoHoF4ZDY&feature=player_embedded
Someone doesn't know there weapons very well.
No matter how many times you repeat this, there are some who simply do not want what they don’t want to hear to be repeated. The coroner, police chief and first responders all said he used the bushmaster. He used the handgun to kill himself. That was not the Bushmaster in the trunk. Thank you so much for being a voice of reason.
As for the Bushmaster, I suspect he ‘liked’ the weapon from it being in video games and perhaps that influenced his mom in purchasing it. Anything is possible.
Did the article mention if he was wearing shoes? I mean, since he was going to die anyway...
“Evidence of Autism = use of ear plugs. Hmmm. Nope.”
Wow, you can’t even be bothered to read the link where his own father talks about his autsim?
Again, because you are obviously retarded:
(1) Lanza was autisic.
(2) Autistic people often have issues with loud noises.
(3) Firearms are loud.
Crazy, yeah. Insane, no.
SnakeDoc
The video shows a shotgun being taken from the trunk, imo.
It’s clearly a shotgun shell that is ejected, imo.
It looks very much like a Saiga to me.
Yes, could be.
Or this was his approach to correcting a misfire. Putting in a new mag if he had a problem. It's not the correct procedure, but he might not have been taught basic sports or any other measures for misfires.
That, and he had different mags full of different types of rounds and simply wanted to see the difference in shooting. The classic ballistic gelatin observation, but with humans.
(And there's MANY MORE predictions of gun control in 0bama's second term..)
NOV. 6TH - OBAMA RE-ELECTED
Nov 7th - Gun maker shares rise after Obama re-election
Nov. 7th - Will the constitution and gun rights be disarmed?
Nov. 7th - Obama's Second Term
Nov. 7th - What Obama’s Second Term Means for Sportsmen
(And there's more chatter of 0bama's second term gun control plans, besides the links above)
AND THEN WHAT WORST POSSIBLE THING COULD HAPPEN THAT WOULD EVOKE 'MAXIMUM OUTRAGE AGAINST GUNS AND GUN OWNERS'? THE MURDER OF INNOCENT CHILDREN IN A CLASSROOM!!!:
DEC. 14TH - SANDY HOOK SCHOOL MASSACRE
Dec. 16th - Sen. Feinstein to introduce gun-control bill next year
JAN 20TH - OBAMA STARTS HIS SECOND TERM
WHAT TIMING!!!.. WAKE UP, PEOPLE!!!
Yet the first TV witnesses said he used pistols. Perhaps the guy from the woods used the Bushmaster... the one in the cammo... or was Adam the one in cammo? No, Adam wore black, with or without a bulletproof vest. One thing for sure: this was the worst cover-up ever.
Somebody else here mentioned he was autistic...and some people with autism are affected by sounds.
I honestly think it was just SOP when he went to the range with his mom...so he stuck them in without even thinking about it.
It IS a shotgun. No doubt about that. More likely a Remington 11-87??
The media briefings in the days after the shooting by the coroner and the top cop provided probably the most accurate information, if one assumes these two men were telling the truth. If what the coroner reported regarding the number of wounds inflicted in each of the victims is accurate, then the AR15 style weapon (the Bushmaster) had to have been the weapon Lanza used during his attack.
When you hear hoofbeats, don’t think zebras.
Or he watched ‘Heat’ about a zillion times.
Why do people continually equate mentally ill with being mentally retarded. Crazy doesn’t mean stupid.
Of course crazy people can plan intricate preparations.
The media was reporting what the witnesses were saying. Either the witnesses lied or the authorities lied.
I hadn't thought of that....but otoh, he could have bought one himself as he had no criminal record that we know of.
Still, we have no proof other than what has been reported that she even owned one....I'm at the point now where I'm questioning everything about this story.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.