Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/09/2013 6:32:42 AM PST by suspects
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: suspects

Totalitarian governments do not want guns in the hands of the proletariat. Its that basic!


2 posted on 01/09/2013 6:39:10 AM PST by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
I’m not sure about the constitutionality of forcing me to report to the government when I pass down my father’s shotgun to my son one day, but once again — this prevents another Newtown...

It's not, and it wouldn't.
But you already knew that.

3 posted on 01/09/2013 6:42:56 AM PST by grobdriver (Sic semper tyrannis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

The point is they always over reach. This time we need to cut off the branch they are proped upon.

Of course, this could all be a negotiating tactic, ask for the moon, take a trip to the space station instead. The left will settle on bans or extreme controls over firearms they categorize as assault weapons and upon magazines over 9 or ten rounds. Furthermore, they will try to restrict large volume ammo buys. Rush aptly noted yesterday how they portray the “second amendment” as a hunting amendment. Of course it was not, they are trying to reframe the amendment to fit their notion of reducing the ability of the serfs to wage war in defense of the constitution. They got their foot in the door with the FA of 1934, augmented that in 68. It seems like they come out of their cacoons every 40 or so years like the 17 year cicadas.


6 posted on 01/09/2013 6:46:12 AM PST by Mouton (108th MI Group.....68-71)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
“Universal background checks” — whatever that means — might or might not be a good thing. They certainly sound reasonable to me.

Yeah, and if you stick together enough tiny tidbits that "sound reasonable" in and of themselves, you end up effectively banning firearms ownership. And make no mistake, banning all civilian firearms ownership is the goal, and it is the ONLY goal. And "universal background checks"is just an incremental step by which to find out who has firearms.

There ARE reasonable things that can be done......allow widespread CCW with no license. End "gun free zones" everywhere. Mandate MUCH longer jail sentences for possessing a firearm during commission of a violent felony. Retain and expand "three-strikes" laws. Make it easier to commit the dangerously mentally disturbed.

7 posted on 01/09/2013 6:48:50 AM PST by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
Obama is not a "two-steps-forward-one-step-back" type of liberal - he's a "full-speed-ahead" Chicago thug and is not about to settle for anything less than a total gun ban.

This will not end pretty.

8 posted on 01/09/2013 6:49:49 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

Obama is a Liberal he doesn’t need a logical reason or any good argument for gun control....to the left it’s simply enough that THEY don’t like something. If the left doesn’t like something they destroy it....it’s a mission to destroy all that their statist “Religion” tells them is evil.

They are on a relentless “Jihad”......If it stands in the way of absolute power then it has to go. The Constitution has been one of their enemies from the begining as it lays out what powers the GOV’t Shouldn’t have(or as lefties say “Negative Rights”.) To them the Gov’t should have the power to do anything.


9 posted on 01/09/2013 6:51:56 AM PST by jakerobins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
“Universal background checks”

Does that mean the shady guy that is selling stolen guns out of the back of his black van to felons, kooks and gang bangers will now have to run background checks since the government has declared them "universal"???

11 posted on 01/09/2013 7:03:43 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

What this article says to me is that the gun grabbers realize that they are in the minority on this issue. They thought the Sandy Hook massacre would sway enough of the public’s opinion to their side on the issue of gun rights to bring them to the majority position, but that doesn’t seem to be the case.

So, once again, it’s not that there is a flaw in their thinking, it’s just that the issue hasn’t been couched in the proper terms.


15 posted on 01/09/2013 7:35:24 AM PST by MNGal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

if they’re so icky, and obama is so serious, i ant him to order the secret service to immediately disarm and remove all weapons out of the white house while he’s president.

i mean his daughters will be so much safer without guns in the house.


19 posted on 01/09/2013 7:56:24 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
I hope everyone has contacted their Senators and Congressmen. Bitchin on FR won't get er done. The phones should be smoking EVERY DAY with calls against EVERYTHING. Not one more law!

When Biden comes up with his suggestions, your guy should bust out laughing whether Dem or Repub.

20 posted on 01/09/2013 8:26:05 AM PST by chuckles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

I’m still waiting for Obama and the DemoQuacks to identify what gun law — other than outright bans and confiscation — could have prohibited the recent mass shooting tragedies.

By the way, where the heck are all the GOP politicians to defend the Second Amendment right now? Why aren’t they taking to the airways with people who saved their lives and those of others by having a gun? Why aren’t they emphasizing the failure of the government to protect the people along the border and in the cities from the heavily-armed Mexican drug cartels? The silence from the GOP is deafening.

It seems that the fix already is in place for more onerous regulations on the matter.


21 posted on 01/09/2013 8:54:48 AM PST by AtlasStalled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects

If he thinks guns are ickie, then he needs to disarm his heavily armed SS police force he is putting together and his SS cover that polishes his butt.


23 posted on 01/09/2013 9:00:19 AM PST by RetiredArmy (1 Cor 15: 50-54 & 1 Thess 4: 13-17. That about covers it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: suspects
Fu Obama.

I. Will. Not. Comply.

29 posted on 01/09/2013 10:59:01 AM PST by Condor51 (Si vis pacem, para bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson