Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Zhang Fei

>> Non-criminals are sent on their way.

Correct me if I’m wrong, but in this country, don’t law-abiding citizens have the right to go about their business without interference from the police?

In other words, why should a law-abiding citizen have to put up with this crap? So that one in FIVE can be taken downtown?

How is this any different from stopping EVERY car on the interstate to find a small percentage of drunks? Or keeping EVERY law abiding citizen from owning an assault rifle because some tiny percentage MIGHT commit a crime with one?

“Guilty until proven innocent” is NOT the basis upon which our civil rights rest, FRiend.


8 posted on 01/09/2013 9:33:53 PM PST by Nervous Tick (Without GOD, men get what they deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick
How is this any different from stopping EVERY car on the interstate to find a small percentage of drunks? Or keeping EVERY law abiding citizen from owning an assault rifle because some tiny percentage MIGHT commit a crime with one?

Stopping cars on the interstate interferes with the flow of traffic. Stopping people on sidewalks doesn't. And the semi-automatic rifles used in unlawful killings for the past 100 years are .02% of the present stock of semi-automatic rifles, whereas 20% of the people frisked are criminals of one kind or another. If 20% of semi-automatic rifles were used in mass killings, there might be a case for strictly regulating them, but we're not there yet.

10 posted on 01/09/2013 9:45:21 PM PST by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Nervous Tick; Zhang Fei; no-to-illegals; All

I remember a NY study in which police stopped every 10th car in the evening going to Long Island for alcohol testing. They found and amazingly large number of violations, far greater than drunk driving accident figures had suggested. The conclusion was that middle aged office workers who had a few too many after work were driving extra careful and not causing accidents. Accidents are mostly caused by reckless wild acting, inexperienced young drivers, predominantly male.


32 posted on 01/09/2013 11:58:44 PM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: Nervous Tick

“Correct me if I’m wrong, but in this country, don’t law-abiding citizens have the right to go about their business without interference from the police?”

What are you some kinda gun nut or something? Where in the world would you get such an idea. The security of the state and the masses demands such searches. After all, as so many here have pointed out many time, “If you have nothing to hide then why would you worry about being searched? (or questioned, or forced to take a breathalyzer etc. etc.)


46 posted on 01/10/2013 10:35:31 AM PST by saleman (!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson