Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Massive Explosion Reported at Iran's Fordow Nuclear Facility [plus TXnMA Photo Analysis]
Business Insider Military and Defense ^ | Jan. 28, 2013, 7:03 AM | Robert Johnson

Posted on 01/29/2013 1:35:14 PM PST by TXnMA

Reports of an explosion at Iran's Fordow nuclear facility have surfaced and are being both confirmed and denied by multiple sources.

The Jerusalem Post cites a report by Reza Kahlili that says: “The blast shook facilities within a radius of three miles. Security forces have enforced a no-traffic radius of 15 miles, and the Tehran- Qom highway was shut down for several hours after the blast.” Kahlili's report says the Fordow nuclear facility was severely damaged in an explosion and up to 240 workers trapped inside. The explosion was reportedly confined to the plant, suggesting that if it were an airstrike, it was highly localized. But this possibility is no more or less likely than sabotage, or an accident, assuming the explosion occurred at all.

>SNIP<

Iran's official news agency, says the same thing, with the IRNA, promptly denying the explosion, claiming the news was simply the result of the Western media-fueled "propoganda machine." That might have ended the story there, but The Times of London's Israel correspondent Sheera Frenkel is confirming the incident through her own independent sources: An explosion is believed to have damaged Iran’s Fordow nuclear facility, which is being used to enrich uranium, Israeli intelligence officials have told The Times. Sources in Tel Aviv said yesterday that they thought the explosion happened last week. The Israeli Government is investigating reports that it led to extensive structural damage and 200 workers had been trapped inside. One Israeli official said: “We are still in the preliminary stages of understanding what happened and how significant it is.” He did not know, he added, if the explosion was “sabotage or accident”, and refused to comment on reports that Israeli aircraft were seen near the facility at the time of the explosion.

(Excerpt) Read more at businessinsider.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: explosion; fordo; fordow; iran; irannuclear; israel; nucleariran; nuclearplantblast; russia; usa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: familyop

You’re just trying to cheer me up.


41 posted on 01/29/2013 2:20:12 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (What word begins with "O" and ends in economic collapse?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

...all your basements are belong to us...


42 posted on 01/29/2013 2:25:34 PM PST by PeaRidge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

Well...you COULD tell us but I expect you’d have a hard time killing us all afterward.


43 posted on 01/29/2013 2:27:57 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist
All I can tell you is that Jay Carney wasn’t lying.

I guess there's a first for everything.
44 posted on 01/29/2013 2:34:17 PM PST by copaliscrossing (Progressives are Socialists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
First, here is the latest publicly- available Google Earth view of the facility, with salient features labeled:

Next, that same view with the relevant portion of the article's image georefenced to the "before" image and rendered with transparecy, allowing both to be visible in the overlay area.

If the article's image is authentic, it is apparent that:

  1. A significant amount of low-albedo material has been ejected and re-deposited over a large area of the site surface.

  2. The center of the jecta appears to be associated with the northern pair of tunnel entrances.

  3. The ejecta deposit extends northward across the highway -- potentially contaminating a section of it.

  4. I have not been able to identify any evidence of a "bunker buster" bomb being the cause of the damage.

  5. The facility may be constructed in at least two independent or isolatable sections. There is no visible ejecta directly associated with the southern tunnel entrances or the single tunnel entrance to the east.

  6. So, only part of the facility may have been directly damaged by the blast. However shock damage may be extnsive throughout the faciity.

  7. The Iranian nuke program just took a big kick in the teeth -- and they have a big mess on their hands!

45 posted on 01/29/2013 2:36:20 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Your link is going to a list of January 2012 earthquakes, over a year ago.

Here is a link from the day in question. It shows a 5.5 earthquake about 50 miles east of Kerman and 50 miles north of Qom, about where the nuclear site is reported to be.

-PJ

46 posted on 01/29/2013 2:40:14 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

The ejecta should be radioactive and be detectable from down wind sensors. Hopefully we’ll hear more.


47 posted on 01/29/2013 2:54:09 PM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Nice work.


48 posted on 01/29/2013 2:55:59 PM PST by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

Kerman is 385 miles ESE of Fordo.


49 posted on 01/29/2013 3:08:49 PM PST by WellyP (question!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

If a partial cause was lithium-ion battery banks, well, let’s just say they ALSO blow up real good, with not a lot of goading.. just my professional experience.

Instant hell on earth if enough go up, and it’s real hard to kill the flame.


50 posted on 01/29/2013 3:09:28 PM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

How far away would the closest non-Iranian sensors be? Possibly far enough that they wouldn’t detect it?


51 posted on 01/29/2013 3:11:03 PM PST by libstripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Unusual image. No blast marks or debris, just a hole (deep underground explosion?) No indication of recovery operation.

To me, it looks like a massive sinkhole, something that you'd see on the surface that was caused by a huge subterranean collapse.

52 posted on 01/29/2013 3:18:21 PM PST by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WellyP
Yeah, I see what I did. I misread Bam as Qom on the map. Still, it was a 5.5 earthquake on the day in question.

-PJ

53 posted on 01/29/2013 3:19:15 PM PST by Political Junkie Too (If you are the Posterity of We the People, then you are a Natural Born Citizen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: familyop

They’ll keep doing these nuclear explosions until somebody puts his eye out...


54 posted on 01/29/2013 3:30:27 PM PST by Hardraade (http://junipersec.wordpress.com (Vendetta))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

I figure that the Saudi’s with the clandestine help of the Israeli’s smuggled in a HE a bomb underground that once detonated caused a serious problem. Once the Uranium Hexaflouride breaks down and the HF acid starts to destroy the things the subsequent release of hydrogen gas will further destroy all contained spaces.

Now I would expect the islamonazi’s to send in their special crazies to salvage what’s left.


55 posted on 01/29/2013 3:30:39 PM PST by Ouderkirk (Obama has turned America into an aristocracy of the unaccomplished.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA

Great post, thanks!

(I learned a new word, albedo)


56 posted on 01/29/2013 3:33:43 PM PST by nascarnation (Baraq's economic policy: trickle up poverty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Proud2BeRight

“What difference does it make?”


That is my new favorite phrase. : )


57 posted on 01/29/2013 3:36:21 PM PST by MWestMom (Will Americans stop someone who views our children as "collateral damage" in their quest for power?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Larry Lucido; battlecry; mnehring; prisoner6; Ray76; Strategerist; ...
My analysis is in Comment #45.

FYI, I did consider the possibility of cloud shadow, but for a cloud to produce a shoadow anywhere near that dark, the cloud would have to be extremely dense (a very tall cumulonimbus) and very close to the ground, And from the satellite altitude, such a low lying cloud would be visible in the image, In fact, it would have obscured the subject.

If anyone can show me an lmage of an isolated (no visible cloud) cloud shadow on Google Earth that produces that same low albedo and high opacity -- I will reconsider my analysis.

That leaves two alternatives: a dark, dusty deposit -- or Photoshop trickery. I'll see if I can fake the effect on the "before" photo...

58 posted on 01/29/2013 3:37:05 PM PST by TXnMA ("Allah": Satan's current alias... "Barack": Allah's current ally...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
Enlarged, reduced contrast, increased brightness, sharpened.
?????


59 posted on 01/29/2013 3:39:12 PM PST by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXnMA
I have not been able to identify any evidence of a "bunker buster" bomb being the cause of the damage.

There were other unconfirmed reports that the facility roof lighting detonated simultaneously in multiple locations. The report went on to say that the explosions were caught on camera prior to the monitoring system going dead.
60 posted on 01/29/2013 3:51:41 PM PST by PA Engineer (Liberate America from the Occupation Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson