Posted on 02/05/2013 4:48:34 PM PST by SJackson
On Saturday, the Obama administrations efforts to maintain the fantasy that diplomatic efforts will get Iran to abandon its pursuit of nuclear weapons was again on display for all the world to see, courtesy of Vice President Joe Biden. During a speech at the Munich Security Conference, Biden contended that the United States would be prepared to meet bilaterally with the Iranian leadership. There has to be an agenda that they are prepared to speak to, Biden added. We are not just prepared to do it for the exercise. The Iranians, meanwhile, are hailing the new approach the Obama administration is taking with Tehran and are no doubt looking forward to the extra time it will afford them to continue on the trajectory of their nuclear weapons program.
One is forced to ponder what outcome Biden could possibly be envisioning that would rise above the level of a futile exercise, given Tehrans continual intransigence and the Obama administrations indulgence of the regimes games. The latest failure to move the needle occurred as recently as January, when nuclear inspectors from the UNs International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) were denied access to the Parchin military complex southeast of Tehran. Parchin is where it has long been suspected that the Iranians are working on a nuclear trigger for a bomb. IAEA deputy inspector Herman Nackaerts expressed his frustration at the time: We had two days of intensive discussions. Differences remain so we could not finalize the structured approach to resolve the outstanding issues regarding possible military dimensions of Irans nuclear program, he said at the time. The two side are scheduled to meet again on February 12.
So what has changed? Nothing on the part of the Iranians. Yet Biden insisted that Iran still had time to change course and resolve the issue through diplomacy. The ball is in the government of Irans court, said Biden. It is well past time for Iran to adopt a serious good-faith approach to negotiations. Abandon the illicit nuclear program and your support for terrorism and there will be meaningful incentives.
Watered-down sanctions and poor oversight are already incentive enough for Iran to stay the course. For instance, Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction John Sopko revealed that an audit of U.S. defense spending in Afghanistan shows that the Pentagon may have spent a significant amount of money for fuel purchased from Iran, due to a lack of oversight on the billions of dollars of taxpayer funds used to support the Afghan military. The fact that the United States has paid for the acquisition and delivery of imported fuel for the Afghan National Security Forces nearly $1.1 billion for the Afghan National Army alone between fiscal years 2007 and 2012 raises concerns that U.S. funds could have been used to pay for imports of fuel potentially in violation of U.S. economic sanctions against Iran, said Sopko.
No doubt this is due to a certain level of bureaucratic sloppiness that is endemic to the kind of ever-expanding government this administration champions. And while that may be somewhat understandable, this administrations ongoing diplomatic approach seems destined to do little more than give Tehran the time it needs to finally cross the nuclear weapon threshold.
Thus it was completely unsurprising that Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi was pleased with Bidens offer. As I have said yesterday, I am optimistic, I feel this new administration is really this time seeking to at least divert from its previous traditional approach vis-a-vis my country, Salehi told the German Council on Foreign Relations. Salehi, who also attended the Munich conference, went further. I think it is about time both sides really get into engagement because confrontation certainly is not the way, he added.
Such a statement is a typical rewriting of history. Negotiations between some combination of the P5+1 countries (United States, Russia, China, Britain, France and Germany) and Iran have been ongoing for a decade. In all that time, not a single proposal has gained acceptance from all the parities involved. Such orchestrated futility is the essence of what a diplomatic approach has produced. Yet once again the P5+1 is offering Iran another chance to engage in negotiations on February 24, possibly in Kazakhstan. While Salehi called this good news, the Iranians have yet to accept. Even if they do, Salehi has offered a hint as to where they are likely to go. And another thing: this issue of the nuclear file is becoming boring, he said during the same interview.
In London, Hossein Mousavian, one of Irans former nuclear negotiators, also hinted at the likely futility another round of multilateral negotiations would produce, claiming that they are meaningless without parallel dialogue between the Obama administration and Iran. I believe they should start immediately. They should put all issues on the table. They should start with issues of common interest like Afghanistan in order to create a positive momentum, he said.
Senator John McCain, who also spoke in Munich, proved once again that willful blindness with regard to Iran is a bipartisan problem. He favors direct talks with Tehran as well, even as he cautioned that optimism may be unwarranted. I think we should learn the lessons of history and that is that no matter what the talks are, if you still have the fundamental problemand the fundamental problem is Iranians commitment to acquisition of a nuclear weaponit doesnt matter to a significant degree, he said. Weve seen this movie before. And obviously, I think any venue we would support, but to have grounds for optimism I think would be a mistake.
After more than ten years of fruitless negotiations, one might be forgiven for wondering when anyone involved in this ongoing fiasco will learn the lessons of history.
That would be anyone on the Western side of the equation. Iran is learning that the Obama administration is seemingly determined to find some sort of accommodation with the fanatical mullahs , and nothing says this better than the presidents attempt, and likely success, in getting Chuck Hagel appointed Secretary of Defense. In 2007, Hagel voted against designating Irans Revolutionary Guard a terrorist group. In 2008 Hagel, like Biden, also favored direct negotiations with Iran, despite noting that they support terrorists, they support Hezbollah. Theyve got their tentacles wrapped around every problem in the middle East. Theyre anti-Israel, anti-United States. Those are realities. Those are facts. In his Senate hearing last week, Hagel explained his reasoning in a jaw dropping moment when he noted that the U.S. had never designated a part of a legitimate government [Iran] as a terrorist organization. Realizing his mistake he corrected himself. Irans government is recognizable, he said.
So is Hagels cluelessness. It is all the more amplified by another gaffe during which he said he supported the Obamas administration policy of containment with regard to Iran, even though the administration has repeatedly ruled that out as an option. In fact, Iran would probably like nothing more than to be at the stage of containment after securing a nuclear weapon.
So what policy should the United States be pursuing with regard to Iran? Writing for PJ Media, Middle East expert Andrew McCarthy explains that focusing solely on nukes is delusional. Exportation of their Islamist revolution, hatred of America and, within that sweep, the destruction of Israel have been the operating premises of Khomeinist Iran since 1979, he writes. The facilitation of terrorisma barbaric way to pursue national interestshas been the regimes principal means of operation. The mullahs have killed or aided and abetted in the killing of thousands of Americans, and every day they try to kill more. The regime is an incorrigible enemy of the United States. There should be nothing they can do at this point, after over 30 years of this, to convince us otherwise.
Apparently the Obama administration remains unconvinced. Though ten years of pursuing diplomacy have produced no tangle results, this administration still believes it is capable of getting an apocalyptic regime to alter its divine objective: hastening the second coming of the Twelfth or Hidden Imam whose re-emergence must be preceded by a period of chaos. And as the U.S. continues down the road of appeasement, expect fanatical Iran to respond accordingly.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
This job would be a natural for Hagel, though Kerry will do OK. Unless Pelosi or Rev Wright are availabe.
If youd like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
This job would be a natural for Hagel, though Kerry will do OK. Unless Pelosi or Rev Wright are availabe.
zero gave him one of our most sophisticated drones, at least the ugly monkey could do is sit down and rap some dictatorship with the illegitimate one.
Didn’t Zero promise in person unconditional talks with the mullahs?
Perhaps if he went over there all by himself...
Hitler wanted direct talks, too, without the pesky League of Nations. Result was world war.
Real headline should read "Obama Caves, Gives Iran What They Wanted All Along"
And Neville Chamberlain was out of power shortly after Germany and Russia invaded Poland. The British parliamentary system allows for that; screw ups get a no-confidence vote, and new elections are held shortly thereafter. So does the Israeli system.
If and/or when Iran detonates a nuclear device over a major city somewhere, Obama will still be President until 2017, unless he’s impeached, resigns, or is in that major city when it blows.
Another bow!
The Obama Administration having talks with Iran will be as fruitful as the Nixon Administration talking with North Vietnam!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.