Replies

It took you two weeks, and all we got for the wait was blather like this?! Ron Paul?! Reliable?!

I am also willing to discuss bad things about ole reliable LRon. Here's just a few ...

Nader, who has recently called this progressive-liberaltarian coalition "the most exciting new political dynamic" in the US today …….. "I believe in coalitions," Rep. Paul echoed.

maher would vote for Lron

Paul will give his seal of approval to four candidates: Green Party nominee Cynthia McKinney, Libertarian Party nominee Bob Barr, independent candidate Ralph Nader and Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin.

Ron Paul booed during Tea Party debate after Osama bin Laden answer

In the space of 24 hours, Rep. Ron Paul (R., Texas) has voted for tax hikes, against censure for Charlie Rangel, and defended Julian Assange.

Ron Paul votes to homosexualize the US Military

Ron Paul hearts Debra Medina

Ron Paul: Ground Zero Mosque Opponents are “Islamophobes.”

Ron Paul wouldn't have approved Osama bin Laden operation

Source: photoshop artist FReeper humblegunner

Thankfully, the circus has left town for good.

Isn’t if funny, as in sad, the way EyeSalveRich accuses folks of “worshipping” Reagan when all we are doing is supporting the IDEAS of Reagan, even over some of the SPECIFIC ACTIONS of Reagan, but of course, to a Kool Aid drinker like little Richie, the notion of ideas over the cult of personality is beyond his liliputian mind.

Servant of the Cross, I take it that you are a Christian. Good. Don’t think that I am some blind follower of Ron Paul. I have some definite disagreements with him. I voted for him because of these facts.
1. He is a professing Christian. God is of supreme importance
2. He is a staunch constitutionalist and has both the voting record and personal life to back that up. The constitution IS the SUPREME law of this land. So I consider it a bit important to have someone who is a staunch supporter of it.
3. A major plank of his is to reduce federal government spending and power without raising taxes. He has the voting record to show for it. He is the only major candidate I know of the supports abolishing the Department Of Education, and putting education back in the hands of the states and communities. The DOE is a primary factor in the loss of the next generation. I consider our children VERY important.
4. He is the only major candidate I am aware of which has stood against the Federal Reserve, the biggest band of criminals in the history of mankind, financially enslaving the world. I consider the financial enslavement of the world a major issue.
Maybe you have other priorities. Okay. But I would at least think you could respect the priorities above. Two of the links you provided were about his bin laden stance. I would think you could at least respect his strong constitutional position that it is not our place to assassinate citizens of other sovereign countries, without declaring war. You may disagree with that. But it is hard to deny if you respect the rule of law.

Please, servant of the cross, tell me who you voted for, and why. I hope it wasn’t for Romney. He is a member of what most Christians consider a cult. He is completely untrustworthy and has flip-flopped on every critical issue. He stands for nothing, and would only have led America down a mildly modified Obama path of more socialism.

Every president in either party except for Andrew Jackson has taken on more debt, and increased the size of the Federal government. Andrew Jackson on the other hand took a firm stand against the banksters, and eliminated the national debt.

Thankfully, the circus has left town for good.

It will have left town when we are living in “The Book of Eli” times.

Sadly, Paul will never get any traction because the country has shifted so far away from the principles upon which this country was founded. The chickens we hathced over the last hundred years will all need to come to roost. It will not be pretty. Though many will see the wisdom in some of his positions, which are based on his core principles, sadly, it will be too late.

It is clear that, though Paul does have some positions I strongly disagree with, he is the closest thing to our founding fathers, regarding his perspective and his willingness to stand behind it, than any other member of any of the three branches of our FedGov.