Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

"Washington Gov. Jay Inslee said the leaking material poses no immediate risk to public safety or the environment because it would take a while — perhaps years — to reach groundwater."

Will this appease those of you around that site???

I know people on this site claim that all nuclear facilities are safe in the US.

1 posted on 02/23/2013 5:13:07 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RummyChick

THIS is an outrage!

Why hasn’t the government (EPA) shut down the government facility???


2 posted on 02/23/2013 5:24:16 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (Hey RATS! Control your murdering freaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

there is more info at the link


3 posted on 02/23/2013 5:24:27 AM PST by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

I don’t see a problem here....just hook up a water system, with a pipe leading from the affected area to Governor Inselee’s house. When the governor finally says he’s had enough....then we will know it’s time to get worried.


4 posted on 02/23/2013 5:28:23 AM PST by pepsionice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

5 posted on 02/23/2013 5:30:13 AM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

There are processes that will turn liquids and their contaminants into resins
Ike plastic beads. This vaslty reduces environmental contamination.


6 posted on 02/23/2013 5:31:05 AM PST by cicero2k
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

I knew some people who worked on a remediation project for Leaking Underground Storage Tanks.

That was an interesting acronym.


9 posted on 02/23/2013 5:33:59 AM PST by mrs. a (It's a short life but a merry one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
"Washington Gov. Jay Inslee said the leaking material poses no immediate risk to public safety or the environment because it would take a while — perhaps years — to reach groundwater."

May take years...May not...But one thing is certain...It WILL reach groundwater...

11 posted on 02/23/2013 5:37:27 AM PST by Iscool (I love animals...barbequed, fried, grilled, stewed,,,,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
Drill, refine, burn gasoline and diesel.

Scrub the emissions at the exhaust.

A one time increase in cost (to a car/truck) distributes the cost .. ummm ... fairly .. to the consumer consuming "fossil fuels"

Nukes for the navy ships and subs, solar for the high school science fair, wind to pump wells and let's get on with REAL progress ...

Like anti-gravity belts ... and skateboards and flux capacitors.

Hell, we've accomplished just about everything RODDENBERRY could dream up.

15 posted on 02/23/2013 5:55:30 AM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick
Mom and Pop gasoline station gets driven out of business when their fuel tanks leak.....

.

Help me here.... The Federal Government gets a free pass.

No problem here...

18 posted on 02/23/2013 7:07:30 AM PST by ptsal (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Don’t get too excited, I don’t think that this “leaking” is exactly as described. After reading the idiotic statement by Governor Inslee about the narrow band of measuring vs a wider band of measuring, and the claim that the tanks had a twenty year life expectancy, I decided to do a little research into the issue.

From a WSJ article posted last September. The feds are going after Bechtel and are claiming that Bechtel is not competent to engineer the project. The feds stopped the project.

“Separately, the DOE last month discovered radioactive material between the walls of one of the site’s newer double-shelled waste-storage tanks, which are designed to be superior to older single-shell tanks. The threat of leaks has been a concern for decades: In the past, according to a project website, one-third of the 177 underground tanks have experienced leakage of toxic material.”

So, the second tanks, not the original tanks, are leaking between the walls of the double sided tanks, not into the ground. The project was intended to replace the tanks by turning the nuclear waste into some kind of glass-like substance, solid, not liquid, that could not “leak”.

There is a lot going on here. First the land is on an Indian reservation. The Indians willingly offered to house the project. Second, the Democrats in WA and Oregon are looking for an environmental issue to demagogue because they are losing ground over the coal exports that they want to transport through WA and Oregon. Gregoire lost her appointment as head of the EPA over her support of the coal and some of the other Democrats know that support of coal is a poison pill here in the Pacific Northwest. Thus, the Hanford clean-up becomes the issue of the day. It is another non-issue that the Democrats are creating for the mid-term elections.


26 posted on 02/23/2013 10:06:58 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RummyChick

Here is the WSJ article:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390443819404577635700925553724.html

Here’s the FOX article on the subject:http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/02/23/6-underground-hanford-nuclear-tanks-leaking-washington-governor-says/


28 posted on 02/23/2013 10:19:45 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson