Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Know It All

“Are you implying that states don’t have the right to regulate commerce within their borders? “

Since when does two men sticking things in places it doesn’t go “Commerce”?


158 posted on 02/27/2013 5:34:15 AM PST by Darksheare (Try my coffee, first one's free.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies ]


To: Darksheare
Since when does two men sticking things in places it doesn’t go “Commerce”?


Silly... That's not "commerce", That's Connect ;) (in an ugly fudge packing way.. ewww :/)..
176 posted on 02/27/2013 7:16:03 AM PST by Bikkuri (Hope for Conservative push in the next 2-4 years..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

To: Darksheare; Mr. Know It All
Maybe the poster, who I take it, has been zapped, was thinking about two men trading feces with each other using their penises as an act of commerce. I guess females were trading vaginal fluids too, so this was considered commerce.

Either way, the expansion of the definition of commerce has been roundly bastardized so that argument could fly in today's legal world. One would need to look up the State's individual Constitution; I would have used that argument. Also Amended clauses, not through case law.
178 posted on 02/27/2013 7:26:47 AM PST by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson