The first freedom fighter?
Posted on 04/03/2013 1:05:29 PM PDT by Kaslin
I’ve never been a big Shakespeare fan, but that may need to change. It seems the Bard of Avon may be the world’s first libertarian.
Some of you are probably shaking your heads and saying that this is wrong, that Thomas Jefferson or Adam Smith are more deserving of this honor.
Others would argue we should go back even earlier in time and give that title to John Locke.
But based on some new research reported in Tax-news.com, Shakespeare preceded them all.
Uncertainty over the likely future success of his plays led William Shakespeare to do “all he could to avoid taxes,” new research by scholars at Aberystwyth University has claimed. The collaborative paper: “Reading with the Grain: Sustainability and the Literary Imagination,”…alleges that, in his “other” life as a major landowner, Shakespeare avoided paying his taxes, illegally hoarded food and sidelined in money lending. …According to Dr Jayne Archer, lead author and a lecturer in Renaissance literature at Aberystwyth: “There was another side to Shakespeare besides the brilliant playwright – a ruthless businessman who did all he could to avoid taxes, maximize profits at others’ expense and exploit the vulnerable – while also writing plays.”
The first freedom fighter?
In that short excerpt, we find three strong indications of Shakespeare’s libertarianism.
1. What does it mean that Shakespeare did everything he could to avoid taxes? His actions obviously would have upset the United Kingdom’s current bloodsucking political elite, which views tax maximization as a religious sacrament, but it shows that Shakespeare believed in the right of private property. Check one box for libertarianism.
2. What does it mean that the Bard “illegally hoarded food”? Well, such a law probably existed because government was interfering with the free market with something like price controls. Or there was a misguided hostility by the government against “speculation,” similar to what you would find from the deadbeats in today’s Occupy movement. In either event, Shakespeare was standing up for the principle of freedom of contract. Check another box for libertarianism.
3. Last but not least, what does it mean that Shakespeare “sidelined in money lending”? Nations used to have statist “usury laws” that interfered with the ability to charge interest when lending money. Shakespeare apparently didn’t think “usury” was a bad thing, so he was standing up for the liberty of consenting adults to engage in voluntary exchange. Check another box for libertarianism.
To be sure, it appears that Shakespeare was more of an operational libertarian rather than a philosophical libertarian.
And now that I’m giving it more thought, perhaps that doesn’t qualify him for the honor of being the world’s first libertarian.
After all, does the former Treasury Secretary, Tim Geithner, deserve to be called a libertarian for evading taxes? Does the new Treasury Secretary, Jack Lew, somehow become a libertarian simply because he utilized the Cayman Islands?
Or what about lawmakers such as John Kerry, Bill Clinton, John Edwards, and others on the left who have utilized tax havens to boost their own personal finances? I very much doubt that any of them deserve to be called libertarian (though the burden of government shrank under Bill Clinton, so maybe we can consider him an unintentional libertarian).
But maybe with a bit of literary license, we can make Shakespeare a full-fledged libertarian.
“O liberty, liberty! Wherefore art thou liberty?”
“Double, double, statism and trouble;
Taxes burn, and regulations bubble!”
Hmmm… perhaps instead of my budding second career as a movie star, I should become a playwright instead?
People have called him just about everything. A Marxist, a Freudian, a Catholic.
I don’t know, was he pro-abortion and for gay marriage and adoption, and for replacing the British people with an unlimited immigration of the world’s population, was he big on homosexualizing the military?
I don’t know, was he pro-abortion and for gay marriage and adoption, and for replacing the British people with an unlimited immigration of the world’s population, was he big on homosexualizing the military?
Even though Shakespeare was never a member of the Virginia Company, there was a connection between the works of Shakespeare and the men who initiated the Virginia Company.The group of friends and associates who began the Virginia Company constructed, ab initio, an association dedicated to political reform. They had been disappointed at James I's failure to reform areas of state abuse left over from Elizabeth's reign They wanted to bring an end to favoritism, monopoly, and monarchical interference in control of taxation; they wished, also, for freedom of election,person and speech, and so inaugurated a "company" in which these ideals could serve as a model for the state. This means that their ideals became the basis for the American Constitution.
William Shakespeare was not, by any stretch of the imagination, a “libertarian.”
Articles like this reinforce my theory that journalists and editorial writers keep three cookie jars next to their computers, each one filled with slips of paper... one jar for proper nouns, another for adjectives, and the third jar for verbs. Sorta takes the pressure off having to actually come up with insightful and thought provoking article topics.
so does William Buffett and George Soros, are they libertarians?
Shakespeare was every man, at one time or another.
What a fascinating theory.
He was right about one thing: “he who steals my purse, steals cash”.
Considering two of those are anachronisms (as well as the article’s premise), I’d say the only one worth examining is Shakespeare being a Recusant.
Then again, lots of people wear Guy Fawkes masks thinking he’s some socialist/anarchist/libertarian thanks to Alan Moore.
Correct response to this article!
Statism
(despots) /\ (no comment)
/ \
/ \
Leftism / \ Conservatism
\ /
\ /
(Liberals) \ / (Founding Fathers)
\/
Libertarianism
Marxism is a theory of history that its adherents claim was around long before Marx. Same with a Freudian view of the human behavior.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.