Posted on 04/17/2013 8:51:44 AM PDT by theruleshavechanged
We know one thing, none of this information would have been caught on a background check, Feinstein insisted. And I say that, although I support backgrounds check.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
No $hit, Sherlock! So she does have a semblance of a brain.
Yes; admits how disgusting they all are, by extension, never mind leaving their agenda bare for the zillionth time.
They mistakenly assume us law-abiding citizens will remain law-abiding regardless. A horrible mistake.
But admitting it is worse. She might have well said, “I support useless laws to pull away law enforcement official away for meaningful, crime preventing duties to harass law abiding citizens, which will in turn, cause more Sandy Hooks.
No, she may as well have admitted that no matter how many new anti-gun laws they pass, it will do nothing to prevent such acts from occurring, But, I DON’T CARE. IT’S FOR YOUR OWN GOOD WHETHER YOU LIKE IT OR NOT.
None of the other Bullslime in your bill would have stopped it either feinswine, but that didn’t stop you did it?
More Botox please.
No matter what Dianne does, she gets a free pass. Nobody’s going to do anything about her. It’s covered.
Look at whose Chairing the Senate Ethics Committee
http://www.ethics.senate.gov/public/
that brings back ... hillary clinton and her .... I am far better able to care for you than you will every be ....
Don’t believe she admitted it for one minute. It’s double speak designed to confuse. Stick to your guns. It is your right; not the government’s right to choose for you.
However, the inexorable parade of new and improved background checks, of which this one would not have been the last, will get us to where even private thoughts will be reported to the State for the purpose of gun seizures. Look at New York.
HIPPA? Forget it.
Not so fast, there. She’s still, and will always be a moron. Don’t go overboard; I guarantee she’ll be back with another “new and improved” gun law.
Fineswine admits this only as justification for total gun confiscation. She made a public statement that she would confiscate all guns if she had the vote. I heard her say it.
download the report at the link
http://www.madinamerica.com/2012/08/neuroleptic-drugs-and-violence/
Observations in prison have also associated neuroleptic treatment with increased aggressive behaviour. Inmates were better able to control their aggression until they were prescribed neuroleptics and then the aggression rate almost tripled.12
It’s no wonder they want thought crimes entered into an anti-2nd database
The treatment scrambles people, and the gun banners want everybody declared insane and drugged. Near 300% increase in aggression.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3008015/posts
Law enforcement does not prevent crime, they are supposed to make sure swift justice will follow the commission of a crime. That alone is the only deterrent to crime.
Police are under no obligation to protect and serve as the Supreme Court has ruled.
Feinstein
“Mr and Mrs America, Turn Them All In.”
here’s your video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vzDO86iSKWU&safe=active
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.