| This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies. |
| Locked on 05/07/2013 2:41:59 PM PDT by Sidebar Moderator, reason: |
Posted on 05/07/2013 2:11:04 PM PDT by paltz
A source with intimate information about the events that happened on the ground in Benghazi the night the U.S. Consulate and the CIA annex was attacked by terrorists told Breitbart News that, ultimately, only the President of the United States, or someone acting on his authority, could have prevented Special Forces either on the ground or nearby from helping those Americans who were under deadly assault.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
Valerie Jarrett
Actual title:
“SOURCE: ONLY PRESIDENT COULD HAVE MADE ‘STAND DOWN’ CALL ON BENGHAZI”
I note that it does not contain any gay hashtags.
“or someone acting on his authority”
This sounds like our Dear Leader is laying the ground work for plausible deniability. “I would’ve never made that call! Someone acting on my behalf made the wrong call, blah blah blah.” Of course this still begs the question: where was Obama during the attack and why didn’t he personally respond? (For the record, I think he DID make the call to stand down.)
Recall after weeks of opportunities to whack Osama, Panetta was the one who said "do it" when Obama gave him the look (it's so alleged).
I would suggest Panetta just "did it" because he had been empowered previously by Obama's inaction,
“I can’t comment on an ongoing investigation. We’ll have to wait for the investigation to find out what it was I was doing that night.” B.H.O.
He went to sleep cause he had to fundraise the next day.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
