[SoothingDave]

$10/channel or 200 channels for $100. Take your choice.

[gleeaikin]

I have never subscribed to cable because there are only a few, like the History Channel that I would want. So, $20 to $40 sounds like a winner to me.

[Norm Lenhart]

Definitely Option one. It defunds the problem.

[Responsibility2nd]

$10/channel or 200 channels for $100. Take your choice.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Isn’t Mccain just pissing up a rope here? Aren’t cable and satelite TV providers going the way of typewriters and print newspapers?

I welcome Netflix and internet TV options. I’ll download and buy my TV shows for $0.99 just I buy my music.

[lonevoice]

Exactly.

[Sender]

$10/channel or 200 channels for $100. Take your choice.

That is what would probably happen, or they might even just delete what you don't watch but charge you the same. However, this is what I have long hoped for, if it could be done economically; I only watch 5 channels and I pay for 200.

And while we're talking about pay TV, why do I pay $100 a month for cable and yet I STILL have to watch 20 minutes of commercials an hour?