Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fr_freak
I am fairly sure the founding fathers did not got to all the trouble of creating the Bill of Rights just to have them negated by a bunch of nattering nay-bobs in a State Assembly.
85 posted on 05/31/2013 7:22:19 AM PDT by Mad Dawgg (If you're going to deny my 1st Amendment rights then I must proceed to the 2nd one...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawgg
I am fairly sure the founding fathers did not got to all the trouble of creating the Bill of Rights just to have them negated by a bunch of nattering nay-bobs in a State Assembly.

Once, again, the Bill of Rights, as well as the rest of the federal Constitution, existed as restrictions on the federal government. How could the States negate something that didn't apply to them? If you don't know that the original arrangement was one where each state was sovereign, as if it were its own country, then you aren't familiar with that part of history. The federal government only had power over the States where the federal Constitution specifically gave it to them (i.e. interstate commerce). Otherwise, fedgov had NO say in how the States conducted their affairs.
89 posted on 05/31/2013 2:27:44 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson