Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama’s Asteroid: The decline of NASA and the senseless priorities of our government (P.J. O’Rourke)
Weekly Standard ^ | June 10, 2013 | P.J. O'Rourke

Posted on 06/01/2013 11:02:47 AM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

1 posted on 06/01/2013 11:02:47 AM PDT by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AndrewC; aragorn; aristotleman; Avoiding_Sulla; ...

Thanks neverdem.


2 posted on 06/01/2013 11:15:41 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Romney would have been worse, if you're a dumb ass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’ve been a big O’Rourke fan for years, but this time he just served up a dog’s breakfast of observations with the explanation that government is run by dolts. That is not the case. There is a concerted effort to muck it all up to usher in a fascist state. Keep your eye on the ball P.J.


3 posted on 06/01/2013 11:21:53 AM PDT by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

Not dolts.

Our problem is something called “state capture”.


4 posted on 06/01/2013 11:24:09 AM PDT by PieterCasparzen (We have to fix things ourselves)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

The author, of course, makes the common mistake that Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars are to be spent on the improvement of America for all Americans.

Nothing could be farther from the truth.

Americans’ hard-earned tax dollars are to be coerced by a corrupt congress in order to provide funds for the purchase of votes from corruptible Americans.

We need to keep that in mind.


5 posted on 06/01/2013 11:24:18 AM PDT by Jack Hammer (American)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
But at the National Space Symposium the joke was the U.S. government. Here was the world’s foremost congregation of people and things having to do with space, and who didn’t show up? NASA.

Had there been panels on Muslim Outreach and Climate Change they would have found the money to be there.

6 posted on 06/01/2013 11:24:47 AM PDT by Mike Darancette (Plan "B" is now Plan "A")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Commercial developers will take the lead now — because government lacks the Vision and Wisdom to do it. But it will go a little slower, because it’ll have to pay its way in profits — which is how it should be.

But foremost, we must catch the imaginations of our young people. Nobody dreams of rendevous with an asteroid. How pathetic — and illustrative of the poverty of Vision in WASHDC.

I suggest this motto to excite the kids once again, as I once was...

“First to Mars, and then to the stars...”

I hope somebody can use it to reignite snuffed imaginations.


7 posted on 06/01/2013 11:43:15 AM PDT by William of Barsoom (In Omnia, Paratus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I used to love PJ O’Rourke when he wrote for the National Lampoon many years ago. I even liked some of his early political writing. But after I saw him bashing Rush Limbaugh on Bill Maher’s show, and watched him drift into leftist BS world, I was done with him. Another sellout.


8 posted on 06/01/2013 11:51:38 AM PDT by ozzymandus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

0bama killed NASA because they generate too much patriotic nationalism. Also, 0bama doesn’t like the idea of saying “Yes NASA!”.


9 posted on 06/01/2013 12:06:32 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
The decline of NASA ...
The decline started after they launched the Shuttle program.
Great technical achievement but after 30+ years and billions of dollars, what the hell do we have to show for it?
10 posted on 06/01/2013 12:07:42 PM PDT by oh8eleven (RVN '67-'68)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Earky on NASA gained enormous prestige. Therefore, it became necessary to share that prestige with the scientifically inept portion of our society. NASA is rapidly becoming a showcase for the hiring of minorities and women. Its performance will bear an inverse relation to the number of the latter hired.


11 posted on 06/01/2013 12:10:42 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (It is a shame that when these people give a riot)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

NASA must make sure that space research provide Muslims with a sense of belonging. Otherwise whats the point in the exploration of anything?


12 posted on 06/01/2013 12:38:09 PM PDT by Dallas59 (Q: The worst president in US history?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ozzymandus
I used to love PJ O’Rourke...

Bump. He still has a wicked pen, but he regressed into a wormhole.

13 posted on 06/01/2013 12:42:09 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (Cyprus - the beginning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: neverdem; All

I grew up watching the lift-offs of NASA’s pre-shuttle manned rockets and was facinated by man walking on moon like everybody else. But now that I’ve actually studied the Constitution, unless you define NASA as a branch of the military, the states have never delegated to Congress via the Constitution the specific power to tax and spend for space exploration purposes.

In other words, in order for Uncle Sam to tax and spend for NASA, the states need to amend the Constitution for Congress to tax and spend for such purposes as much as amendments are required for Obamacare, public schools and regulating environment as examples.

So killing NASA is one thing that Obama did right regarding Congress’s constitutionally limited powers regardless that his motives are questionable.


14 posted on 06/01/2013 12:44:57 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

June 10, 2013?


15 posted on 06/01/2013 12:49:25 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amendment10
unless you define NASA as a branch of the military

I'm okay with that. Missile technology. Satellite technology. Other advancements that help our military come from it.

The global corporations would just as soon sell to China and Iran as they would, well there is no one here to sell it to...

16 posted on 06/01/2013 12:53:12 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (America 2013 - STUCK ON STUPID)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Earky on NASA gained enormous prestige. Therefore, it became necessary to share that prestige with the scientifically inept portion of our society. NASA is rapidly becoming a showcase for the hiring of minorities and women. Its performance will bear an inverse relation to the number of the latter hired.

Hispanics and blacks have never liked the space program, they figure a dollar spent on NASA means one less dollar spent on social programs for them. And young white people are heavy into and brainwashed by the "green BS" being promoted today, not space exploration. The are more interested in America being as green as possible, they fall for that Obama BS. They are regressing from the industrial age to the agricultural age.

17 posted on 06/01/2013 1:03:15 PM PDT by dennisw (too much of a good thing is a bad thing - Joe Pine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

The funniest thing I ever read: “I will never forget the look on that cows’ face”


18 posted on 06/01/2013 1:37:14 PM PDT by Mr. K (There are lies, damned lies, statistics, and democrat talking points.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: zot; Interesting Times

pj o’rourke on nasa


19 posted on 06/01/2013 1:50:35 PM PDT by GreyFriar (Spearhead - 3rd Armored Division 75-78 & 83-87)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K

A NASA geek would probably say move a decimal point...;-)


20 posted on 06/01/2013 2:05:41 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (It's not the color of one's skin that offends people...it's how thin it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson