Posted on 06/19/2013 2:09:26 PM PDT by NYer
.- Despite passing the U.S. House of Representatives, a bill to prohibit abortions after 20 weeks of pregnancy faces an uncertain future as President Obama's administration has suggested that he will veto it.
“(S)cience is on our side,” Representative Marsha Blackburn, (R- Tenn.) told MSNBC in an interview.
Blackburn joined other pro-life representatives, including Michelle Bachmann (R- Minn.) and Virginia Foxx (R- N.C.) in defending the Pain-Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortions 20 weeks into a pregnancy and later, based on science indicating that unborn children can feel pain by this point. Exceptions in cases of rape, incest or a risk to the mother’s life were included in the final House version of the legislation.
The House of Representatives approved the bill by a vote of 228-196 on June 18, following its passage by the House Judiciary Committee. The legislation will now advance to the Senate, where opponents have vowed to fight it.
The Obama Administration has said that should the legislation gain the approval of both the House and Senate, the president's “senior advisors would recommend that he veto this bill.”
A statement of administration policy criticized the bill, saying that it “would unacceptably restrict women's health and reproductive rights and is an assault on a woman's right to choose.”
The statement alleged that the legislation “is a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade and shows contempt for women's health and rights, the role doctors play in their patients' health care decisions, and the Constitution.”
It is unclear how the Supreme Court would react to the pro-life legislation were it to be challenged as a violation of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision.
Pro-life advocates pointed to polls showing that the majority of Americans support restricting late-term abortions.
“May we in humility confront this national sin and may we mourn what abortion reveals about the conscience of our nation,” said Rep. Foxx.
Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.), who introduced the legislation, argued in a June 13 statement that “(k)nowingly subjecting our innocent unborn children to dismemberment in the womb, particularly when they have developed to the point that they can feel excruciating pain every terrible moment leading up to their undeserved deaths, belies everything America was called to be.”
“This is not who we are,” he said.
Pro-life advocates have attempted to gain support for the bill's cause, using the hashtag #theyfeelpain on Twitter.
Despite the pledged opposition from the Senate and White House, supporters are confident that the American people are becoming more aware of the reality of abortion.
Last year, a similar piece of legislation that would have applied only to the District of Columbia failed to pass the House of Representatives.
“The tide of the American conscience will only continue to shift toward life and away from dismembering unborn babies in the womb,” said Rep. Franks in a June 18 tweet.
Catholic ping!
Shocked, I tell you. I’m just shocked! s/
The barbarian who voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act 3 times doesn’t care whether infants feel pain while they are being dismembered in their mothers’ wombs! Quelle suprise!
Just another facade. What is the difference between 19 and 20 weeks?
Small steps I guess is better than none. (if NObama sign it which she won’t)
As EACH day goes by, I am coming more and more to the conclussion that this guy is demon possessed.
What about the health and right to choose of unborn women?
I really hope he gets the chance to veto this bill for all the world to see...so there will be no doubt who and what he stands for
Next....”The Ovens!!!”
Monster.
He is in bed with radical man-hating feminazis who give a lot of money to the dems so they can keep their precious abortion.
The other dictator, Harry Reid, will stop any vote in the Senate... so OAbort is pandering to the death coalition
Go to theulstermanreport.com sound like a definite possibility.
.
Not surprising, one of his few non-Present votes as a state senator was to vote against protecting the life of a baby born alive as a result of a botched abortion.
I’m going to keep saying it until someone tells me to shut up :) Obamacare and Roe v Wade cannot both be constitutional. If Roe established a right to privacy, then Obamacare eviscerates it by inserting the federal govt into every health related decision from purchase of insurance to monitoring her doc’s compliance with federally established treatment protocols.
This Obama thing is the most evil monster that ever existed
When he first took office, I seriously doubted that his was the Anti-Christ. But now, I'm beginning to believe he is at least his executive assistant.
Fetuses cannot vote so Obama does not care about fetal pain.
Any non-Democrat woman or girl is already legally killable in Obama’s New Amerika.
Meh, it’ll get ash-canned in the Senate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.