I see your point but if this is the case, then why aren't patriotic NSA, FBI, CIA, etc. outing Obama/Valerie Jarrett/Brennan/Holder/muslim brotherhood?
Not sure on that one, since no disclosures of those people have occurred. What Snowden has disclosed so far has dealt mainly with his former employer's client - the NSA - as opposed to leaking information about Obama, his handlers, and any connections.
Of all the juiciest information he could leak - information that would incriminate the Executive Branch of the US Government - he's not leaking it. He's not even thrown one piece that isn't against his former employer's client.
The evidence is not adding up to Snowden making a direct opposition to Obama at this point. His information may imply something, but that's all there seems to be at this point.
Why isn't NSA, et. al doing something about it unless they themselves are complicit?
That's a difficult question to answer given that there's no publicly available evidence (as far as they're willing to disclose). One can only speculate to what they're doing.
Something will stick to Obama, but I don't see it coming from Snowden based on the evidence so far. It will have to come from the excessive weight of scandal - something that provides solid evidence.