Replies

I don’t know the train of thought between back & forth comments, Fawn, but is your comment related to concern over lack of expert ability to identify the screamer. ie, the “unreliable” and “waste of time” quotes??

Then you seemed concerned that State would bring that up in closing argument?

If I have this wrong, please clarify.

Because, in a trial where proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt is the standard, if the State can’t do any better than having an expert say it’s a waste of time and unreliable to try identifying the screamer, that is a GOOD thing for the defense.

All that would help the State’s “case” is if they could establish that it was Trayvonn screaming (of course we know it wasn’t, but just sayin’...). Anything less is a huge defense win.