You don’t seem to “got” anything, you just keep slip sliding around and throwing out all kinds of made up nonsense.
You refused to answer post 29, and you are none responsive to post 41.
Since today’s topic is homosexuality, tell us where libertarianism is in opposition to this libertarian position.
1.3 Personal Relationships (libertarian)
Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government’s treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption, immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.
i have answered you, numerous times. you’re just a little too obsessed with other peoples sexuality to comprehend what you’re being told
ANYONE that believes in small govt CANNOT be in favor of the fedgov having ANY say in the personal relationships of its citizens.
personally, i’m appalled by homosexuality... but that doesn’t mean i want my government to get into the business of dictating my designs of interpersonal relationships onto other people.
you, on the other hand, seem to want a fedgov that has control over the personal lives of all Americans to the point of dictating who they are allowed to date. how you claim to be on the right side of the political spectrum is beyond me.
i’m pretty sure you’re a progressive democrat