Posted on 07/04/2013 9:53:13 AM PDT by jonno
There was a "gay" bookstore called Lobo's in Austin, Texas, when I was living there as a grad student. The layout was interesting. Looking inside from the street all you saw were books. It looked like any other bookstore. There was a section devoted to classic "gay" fiction by writers such as Oscar Wilde, Gertrude Stein, and W.H. Auden. There were biographies of prominent "gay" icons, some of whom, like Walt Whitman, would probably have accepted the homosexual label, but many of whom, like Whitman's idol, President Lincoln, had been commandeered for the cause on the basis of evidence no stronger than a bad marriage or an intense same-sex friendship. There were impassioned modern "gay" memoirs, and historical accounts of the origins and development of the "gay rights" movement. It all looked so innocuous and disarmingly bourgeois. But if you went inside to browse, before long you noticed another section, behind the books, a section not visible from the street. The pornography section. Hundreds and hundreds of pornographic videos, all involving men, but otherwise catering to every conceivable sexual taste or fantasy. And you would notice something else too. There were no customers in the front. All the customers were in the back, rooting through the videos. As far as I know, I am the only person who ever actually purchased a book at Lobo's. The books were, in every sense of the word, a front for the porn. - snip -
(Excerpt) Read more at virtueonline.org ...
So right.
Excellent comment. Homosexuals who engage in the sexual lifestyle are narcissists, and by definition cannot love someone else. It is always all about themselves, which is antithetical to Christianity.
Now all of them could go back to pretending that gay men were all young and beautiful forever. Gentle reader, do you know what a "bug chaser" is? A bug chaser is a young gay man who wants to contract HIV so that he will never grow old.
It's a lifestyle of despair and living for those brief moments of sexual release.
Love this comment! Just about sums it all up! i will use this in my arguments in future
...the issues herein raised ping....
“They have the right to sodomize each other all they want”
You have said that twice, now, but what I am asking for is the source of that right.
“You have said that twice, now, but what I am asking for is the source of that right.”
Do you have the right to stop them? If so, where did you get that right?
I guess no one ever taught you civics, so I’m just going to have to do it: You have the right to do anything you damned well please unless it violates the rights of others. That’s freedom. It doesn’t need any further explanations.
“I guess no one ever taught you civics, so I’m just going to have to do it: You have the right to do anything you damned well please unless it violates the rights of others. That’s freedom. It doesn’t need any further explanations.”
Really? Because the Declaration of Independence states as a self-evident truth that our Creator endows us with rights.
Unless rights have a source, unless they are grounded in more than a person’s subjective judgment of what violates the rights of others, they mean nothing.
Your definition of freedom has led to the killing of well over 50 million innocent babies, not to mention what it has done to the institution of the family.
It has led to the United States Supreme Court endorsing sodomite play-pretend marriage.
It is very likely to bring us legalized child molestation in the near future, simply by persuading the Supreme Court that children are not harmed by sex with adults.
God is the source of true rights, which means that nothing which offends Him can be a right. He extends to humanity the freedom to choose Evil, but there is a critical difference between a freedom to do Evil and a right to do Evil—the latter cannot exist.
Sodomites are extended the freedom to engage in their loathsome perversions by the United States Government and by God. However, there is not, nor can there ever be, a right to engage in such Evil.
GOD, when he have us a free will to sin.
They DO have that right. They don’t have the right to have the state ENDORSE their sin. Or approve it.
Ann, is that you?
Ann, is that you?
“Your definition of freedom has led to the killing of well over 50 million innocent babies”
You’re an idiot if you think that. My definition says they cannot kill babies as babies have rights, too.
Wanna know why people tune out on the abortion issue? People like you that go all wacko. I want to ban abortion, yet, you think the founding father’s way of thinking lets people kill babies. You think emotionally just like a liberal.
“My definition says they cannot kill babies as babies have rights, too.”
Do they? Who says?
Can’t you figure out the implications of empowering human beings to decide who is endowed with what rights?
Try hard, and get back to me in about a decade.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.